To repeal the 16th amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Impact
If HCR10 is successful, and Congress agrees to call a constitutional convention, it could significant alter the landscape of federal taxation power. The repeal of the 16th Amendment would remove the federal government's ability to levy income taxes, compelling states to explore alternative revenue sources. This could have profound effects on federal revenues and state finances, potentially leading to greater disparities in how states fund their programs. The resolution reflects a broader critique of federal overreach and advocates for a return to a tax system viewed as more equitable by those supporting the repeal.
Summary
House Concurrent Resolution 10 (HCR10) proposes to urge Congress to convene a states' convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution, specifically to repeal the 16th Amendment. The 16th Amendment allows Congress to impose an income tax, which HCR10 aims to eliminate by applying to other states to support this initiative. The resolution emphasizes the states' rights to initiate constitutional amendments and seeks to gather enough support from a two-thirds majority in state legislatures to compel Congress to act. This approach highlights a push for greater state autonomy over federal taxation policies.
Sentiment
Supporters of HCR10 express a strong sentiment towards limiting federal taxation authority, often arguing that the income tax system is oppressive and mismanaged. They contend that a repeal would return control to the states, empowering local economies and citizen autonomy. Conversely, opponents warn that such a repeal could strip essential federal funding from states, jeopardizing critical programs in healthcare, education, and infrastructure. This division illustrates the ongoing debate over the balance of power between state and federal governments, reflecting broader themes of governance and fiscal responsibility in American politics.
Contention
The main contention surrounding HCR10 is the potential social and economic ramifications of repealing the income tax. Critics fear that without the federal income tax, the federal government would face severe budgetary constraints, impacting its ability to fund vital services. Furthermore, the method of calling for a convention itself is fraught with concerns about what additional amendments could arise from this process, leading some to label the measure as risky. Proponents, however, assert that this action is a necessary step towards reclaiming state rights and fostering a fairer system of taxation.
Urging Congress call a convention of the states, under the authority reserved to the states in Article V of the United States Constitution, limited to proposing Amendments to the Constitution of the United States to create fiscal responsibility by and within the federal government.
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.
Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.
Write the Laws ActThis bill prohibits an act of Congress from containing any delegation of legislative powers, whether to any component within the legislative branch, the President or any other member of the executive branch, the judicial branch, any agency or quasi-public agency, any state or state instrumentality, or any other organization or individual.The Government Accountability Office must identify to Congress all statutes enacted before the date that is 90 days after this bill's enactment that contain any delegation of legislative power.Any act of Congress, presidential directive, adjudicative decision, rule, or regulation that is enacted 90 days or more after this bill's enactment and is noncompliant with this bill shall have no force or effect.
Ratifying A Proposed Amendment To The Constitution Of The United States Giving The Congress Of The United States Power To Limit, Regulate, And Prohibit The Labor Of Persons Under Eighteen Years Of Age.