Arizona 2022 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2649

Introduced
2/3/22  
Report Pass
2/7/22  
Report Pass
2/14/22  
Engrossed
2/18/22  
Report Pass
3/3/22  
Report Pass
3/7/22  
Enrolled
3/18/22  
Passed
3/24/22  
Chaptered
3/24/22  

Caption

Concurrent jurisdiction; Yuma proving ground

Impact

The enactment of HB 2649 is expected to facilitate better law enforcement oversight in federally managed areas, including national parks and military installations. By formalizing the processes for sharing jurisdiction, the bill seeks to enhance public safety and ensure that legal jurisdictional issues do not hamper law enforcement activities. Furthermore, the provisions include mechanisms for the state to withdraw jurisdiction if necessary, thereby providing a flexible legal environment for managing these lands.

Summary

House Bill 2649 addresses the issue of concurrent criminal jurisdiction for certain federally administered lands within Arizona, specifically targeting locations such as the Yuma Proving Ground. The bill amends section 37-620 of the Arizona Revised Statutes and establishes that the state retains jurisdiction over these lands while allowing the United States to exercise concurrent jurisdiction upon request. This framework is intended to provide clarity and ensure law enforcement coordination on these significant federal properties.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be supportive among legislators, as evidenced by its unanimous passing in the Senate. Lawmakers recognize the importance of clearly defined jurisdictional authority, especially in areas with significant federal presence. However, there may be underlying concerns from local communities about the implications of federal authority on local governance, even if these concerns were not prominently voiced during discussions.

Contention

While the bill is largely directed towards practical law enforcement needs, it involves complexities surrounding jurisdictional boundaries between state and federal authorities. Lawmakers had to navigate the potential for conflicts and the need for collaboration between local law enforcement agencies and federal entities. The requirement for a memorandum of understanding with local sheriffs, particularly in the case of the Yuma Proving Ground, highlights the nuanced discussions required to align responsibilities and ensure effective cooperation between jurisdictions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AR SB121

To Amend The Arkansas State Capitol And Historical Monument Protection Act; And To Declare An Emergency.

AZ SB1407

State capitol areas; jurisdiction; maintenance

UT SCR006

Concurrent Resolution Creating the Golden Spike State Monument

CA SJR17

The Sáttítla National Monument.

UT HCR008

Concurrent Resolution Creating the Butch Cassidy State Monument

UT HCR013

Concurrent Resolution Creating the Bridal Veil Falls State Monument

AL HB246

Monuments, Alabama Memorial Preservation Act of 2017, a county or municipality authorize to remove any monument located on public property for less than 50 years, a waiver required from Committee on Alabama Monument Protection before monument can be removed that has been situated for 50 years of more, Sec. 41-9-230 repealed; Secs. 41-9-231 to 41-9-237, inclusive, am'd.

GA HB467

State flag, seal, and other symbols; protection of government statues and monuments; revise provisions