Arizona House Bill HB2554

Arizona 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Report Pass: 2/13/23
• Report Pass: 2/20/23
• Report Pass: 2/27/23
• Engrossed: 3/1/23
• Report Pass: 3/23/23
• Report Pass: 3/28/23

Caption

Search and rescue equipment fund

Impact

The bill appropriates $1,000,000 from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2023-2024 to support this initiative. Funds are allocated to specific counties based on outlined percentages, which vary according to the geographical needs and operational demands. Notably, larger counties such as Coconino and Mohave receive a more significant portion of the funding, while smaller counties have capped allocations. This approach is intended to ensure that all counties have access to essential equipment for emergency situations, thereby improving public safety across Arizona.

Summary

House Bill 2554 establishes the County Sheriffs Search and Rescue Equipment Fund, aimed at enhancing the search and rescue capabilities of county sheriff's offices in Arizona. The bill amends Title 41 of the Arizona Revised Statutes by adding a new section that details how the fund will be managed and the criteria for distributing funds to various counties. The state treasurer is tasked with administering the fund, ensuring that appropriated funds are allocated effectively to improve search and rescue operations statewide.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2554 appears largely positive, particularly among law enforcement and emergency management circles. Supporters argue that enhanced funding for search and rescue equipment is crucial for public safety and disaster response preparedness. There is a recognition of the diverse challenges faced by sheriffs' offices in different counties, which the bill seeks to address by channeling resources where they are needed most. However, there may also be underlying concerns regarding equitable distribution and whether smaller counties can effectively utilize the funds allocated to them.

Contention

While the bill has received favorable support in committees, discussions could arise surrounding the sustainability of annual funding, local versus centralized control of the funds, and the effectiveness of the distribution model. Opponents might question if the allocation percentages adequately reflect the needs of all counties, particularly those with limited capacity to undertake search and rescue missions. Furthermore, the exemption from the lapsing of appropriations may garner scrutiny on how unutilized funds are rolled over and reallocated for future fiscal planning.