Arizona 2023 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HCR2006

Introduced
2/13/23  
Report Pass
2/15/23  
Report Pass
2/27/23  

Caption

Sessions of legislature; repeal sessions

Impact

If enacted, HCR2006 would significantly alter the legislative calendar in Arizona, mandating a repeal session where only legislation that seeks to repeal laws enacted three or more years prior could be entertained. This change is intended to simplify the legislative process and ensure that obsolete laws are systematically addressed, potentially enhancing the efficiency of state governance. Proponents argue that stronger oversight of existing laws is crucial for adapting to changing societal needs and priorities.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 2006 (HCR2006) proposes an amendment to the Arizona Constitution, specifically targeting Article IV, part 2, section 3. The amendment seeks to outline the procedures for legislative sessions including standard annual sessions, special sessions initiated by the governor, and introducing a repeal session held once every two years. The primary goal of this resolution is to streamline legislative processes and ensure regular evaluation and potential dismantling of outdated laws, thereby promoting a more responsive governance structure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR2006 is mixed among legislators. Supporters view the bill as a necessary reform that facilitates better governance by providing a formal mechanism for law removal, which could lead to a more efficient legislative process. However, there are concerns expressed by some legislators about this approach potentially undermining legislative stability, as frequent changes to the law could disrupt established practices and expectations among Arizona residents.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions around HCR2006 include the potential implications for existing laws and the expanded powers of the governor in calling special sessions. Critics argue that giving the governor the ability to limit legislation discussions to specifically defined subjects could centralize power excessively. The debate also extends to whether the repeal process might lead to the dismissal of laws that, while old, serve an important function or protect certain interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

CA AB1577

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon