Arizona 2023 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SB1418 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Senate Engrossed attorneys; court professionals; discipline; juries (now: religious; political beliefs; adverse actions) State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature First Regular Session 2023 SENATE BILL 1418 An Act amending title 12, chapter 7, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding article 3; relating to government. (TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)
1+REFERENCE TITLE: attorneys; court professionals; discipline; juries State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature First Regular Session 2023 SB 1418 Introduced by Senator Wadsack: Representative Jones An Act amending title 32, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding chapter 2; relating to the supreme court. (TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)
22
33
44
55
66
77
88
9-Senate Engrossed attorneys; court professionals; discipline; juries (now: religious; political beliefs; adverse actions)
9+REFERENCE TITLE: attorneys; court professionals; discipline; juries
1010 State of Arizona Senate Fifty-sixth Legislature First Regular Session 2023
11-SENATE BILL 1418
11+SB 1418
12+Introduced by Senator Wadsack: Representative Jones
1213
13-Senate Engrossed
14-
15-
16-
17-attorneys; court professionals; discipline; juries
18-
19-(now: religious; political beliefs; adverse actions)
14+REFERENCE TITLE: attorneys; court professionals; discipline; juries
2015
2116
2217
2318
2419
2520
2621
2722
2823
2924 State of Arizona
3025
3126 Senate
3227
3328 Fifty-sixth Legislature
3429
3530 First Regular Session
3631
3732 2023
3833
3934
4035
4136
4237
4338
4439
45-SENATE BILL 1418
40+SB 1418
41+
42+
43+
44+Introduced by
45+
46+Senator Wadsack: Representative Jones
47+
48+
49+
50+
51+
52+
53+
54+
55+
56+
4657
4758
4859
4960
5061
5162
5263
5364 An Act
5465
5566
5667
57-amending title 12, chapter 7, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding article 3; relating to government.
68+amending title 32, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding chapter 2; relating to the supreme court.
5869
5970
6071
6172
6273
6374 (TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)
6475
6576
6677
67- Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona: Section 1. Title 12, chapter 7, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding article 3, to read: ARTICLE 3. PROTECTED POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS BELIEFS START_STATUTE12-851. Prohibited adverse actions; jurisdiction; civil, criminal or administrative action; definitions A. A GOVERNMENT AGENT MAY NOT INITIATE, TAKE, CONDUCT, ASSIST, PARTICIPATE IN OR CONSPIRE TO HAVE UNDERTAKEN AN ADVERSE ACTION AGAINST ANY NATURAL PERSON IF a substantial motivation for THE GOVERNMENT AGENT'S DECISION TO DO SO IS MOTIVATED BY AN UNLAWFUL ANIMUS, EVEN IF THAT NATURAL PERSON WOULD OTHERWISE PROPERLY BE THE SUBJECT OF THE ADVERSE ACTION. B. NO COURT IN THIS STATE HAS JURISDICTION OVER AN ADVERSE ACTION BROUGHT IN VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION. THE SUBJECT OF AN ADVERSE ACTION MAY OBJECT TO THE EXERCISE OF a court's JURISDICTION ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE ACTION is in violation of SUBSECTION A of this section. ON OBJECTION, THE COURT SHALL NOT ASSERT JURISDICTION UNLESS IT FINDS, BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT THE GOVERNMENT agent HAS NOT VIOLATED SUBSECTION A of this section. C. ALL JUDGMENTS, CONVICTIONS, ORDERS, CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PENALTIES, SENTENCES AND DECISIONS RENDERED IN VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION A of this section SHALL be DELETED FROM ALL GOVERNMENT RECORDS AND DEEMED UNENFORCEABLE AND INVALID. D. ANY NATURAL PERSON who is SUBJECT TO A VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION A of this section MAY RAISE THE ISSUE AT ANY TIME FOLLOWING the DISCOVERY OF the UNLAWFUL ANIMUS. E. A CRIMINAL CONVICTION OR PENALTY that is IMPOSED IN VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION A of this section MAY BE RAISED PURSUANT TO section 13-4231, paragraph 2 EXCEPT THAT RELIEF MAY NOT BE PRECLUDED FOR THE FAILURE TO TIMELY RAISE THE ISSUE OR ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE ACCUSED CONSENTED TO JURISDICTION OF THE COURT. F. ANY EVIDENCE OBTAINED PURSUANT TO A SEARCH OR SEIZURE THAT IS IN VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS INADMISSIBLE IN ANY ADMINISTRATIVE, CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. G. AN ARREST THAT IS MADE IN VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS INVALID. H. IF A GOVERNMENT AGENT VIOLATES SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION, THE natural PERSON WHOSE RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED MAY BRING A CAUSE OF ACTION IN STATE OR FEDERAL COURT AGAINST BOTH THE GOVERNMENT AGENT AND THE GOVERNMENT ENTITY THAT EMPLOYS OR CONTRACTS WITH THE GOVERNMENT AGENT, INCLUDING THIS STATE, EXCEPT THAT THIS STATE IS NOT SUBJECT TO A SUIT IN FEDERAL COURT. AN ACTION BROUGHT PURSUANT to THIS SUBSECTION SHALL BE COMMENCED WITHIN FOUR YEARS AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE, CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PROCEEDING OR INVESTIGATION THAT WAS MOTIVATED BY AN UNLAWFUL ANIMUS, INCLUDING ALL APPEALS. IT IS NOT A DEFENSE TO THE CAUSE OF ACTION THAT THE natural PERSON WHOSE RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED WOULD OTHERWISE PROPERLY BE THE SUBJECT OF THE ADVERSE ACTION OR THAT THE ADVERSE ACTION RESULTED IN AN ADVERSE JUDGMENT, DECISION, OPINION, VERDICT OR RULING AGAINST THE natural PERSON WHOSE RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED. I. IN ANY CAUSE OF ACTION FILED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION H OF THIS SECTION, A PREVAILING PLAINTIFF MAY RECOVER DECLARATORY RELIEF, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, NOMINAL DAMAGES, ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS. J. Subsections H and I of this section do not apply to A peace officer who makes an arrest of a natural person who is subject to an adverse action in violation of subsection A of this section. K. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION: 1. "Adverse action": (a) Means: (i) Any criminal or civil investigation or prosecution of any natural person. (ii) Any proceeding of any sort that seeks any adverse administrative, civil or criminal action against any natural person. (b) Does not include an action against a natural person in that natural person's official capacity. 2. "GOVERNMENT AGENT" MEANS ANY LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL OFFICIAL WHO IS EMPLOYED BY OR CONTRACTS WITH GOVERNMENT IN THIS STATE AT ANY LEVEL AND WHO IS ACTING IN THAT CAPACITY OR ANY MEMBER, EMPLOYEE OR CONTRACTOR OF A REGULATORY BOARD OR COMMISSION IN THIS STATE AT ANY LEVEL AND WHO IS ACTING IN THAT CAPACITY. 3. "UNLAWFUL ANIMUS" MEANS A DISAGREEMENT WITH OR DISLIKE OF A natural PERSON'S RELIGIOUS OR POLITICAL BELIEFS, POSITIONS, ASSOCIATIONS OR EXPRESSION. END_STATUTE Sec. 2. Short title This act may be cited as the "First Amendment Protection Act".
78+ Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona: Section 1. Title 32, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding chapter 2, to read: CHAPTER 2 ATTORNEYS AND COURT PROFESSIONALS ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS START_STATUTE32-201. Attorneys; complaints; discipline; right to jury hearings; prohibitions; perjury A. The supreme court may process complaints filed against an attorney and discipline an attorney through the state bar of Arizona. In disciplinary proceedings, the supreme court shall provide notice and an opportunity for a hearing pursuant to rules adopted by the supreme court and shall disclose the attorney's responses to the complainant. B. In addition to following the Arizona rules of professional conduct, an attorney shall: 1. Swear an oath to the United States constitution and the Arizona constitution and defend the rights of the ATTORNEY'S clients PURSUANT TO ARTICLE vi, CLAUSE 3, uNITED sTATES cONSTITUTION. Any other oath sWEaring allegiance to the court oR any ENTITY other than the constitution is void and prohibited. 2. Defend the rights of the attorney's clients, including article II, section 23, Constitution of Arizona, effectuated by the tenth amendment, United States Constitution. C. If an attorney who is being investigated or disciplined by the state bar of Arizona believes that civil penalties, fines or discipline are excessive or unjust or that justice is not served by a decision of the state bar of Arizona in a disciplinary proceeding, within forty-five days after the decision the attorney may REQUEST and shall be provided a new hearing in superior court in the county of jurisdiction within forty-five days after the REQUEST. D. Mediation, including discussions and negotiations between the parties, is the preferred method of settling disputes relating to an attorney. Records of mediation or the fact that there has not been mediation shall be placed on the record for the judge and jury to consider. If mediation fails, a bench trial shall be conducted in superior court at which A JUDGE SHALL EXAMINE the evidence and ISSUE a ruling. If the attorney believes the judicial ruling is unjust, the attorney may demand and shall be furnished another bench trial with the same judge at which a jury shall examine evidence and render a verdict. E. Notwithstanding any other law, FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION a jury shall consist of ten citizens chosen at random from a jury pool. The jury may enter a verdict to disbar an attorney only by unanimous verdict using evidence that reaches the standard of clear and convincing. If the evidence does not reach this standard, the attorney shall remain licensed to practice law or have sanctions reduced as determined by the jury. Jury instructions shall include a copy of this section and the court record. f. Perjury, providing false or manufactured evidence or withholding exculpatory evidence is prohibited and: 1. Is punishable under title 13, chapter 27. 2. Is a class 4 felony. 3. Shall be enforced in criminal court. 4. A person may refer a violation of this subsection to the county attorney or the attorney general. g. Total fees for all subsequent hearingS DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION, INCLUDING a jury, may not exceed $500. h. Attorneys and court appointed professionals shall be verifiably noticed of the option to have a jury make the final decision for sanctions, including disbarment. Failure to notice shall render decisions made by the state bar of Arizona void and unenforceable requiring further proceedings to settle a dispute. i. In a hearing pursuant to this section, a jury may sanction a party, including the state bar of Arizona, for misconduct in an amount of not more than $5,000, which may be paid to any party to the hearing. j. For decisions made by the state bar of Arizona before the effective date of this section, if the attorney did not explicitly waive the attorney's right to a jury, the attorney is entitled to a new hearing as prescribed in this section.END_STATUTE START_STATUTE32-202. Licensed professionals; complaints; hearings; prohibitions A. tHE supreme court shall exercise regulatory responsibility and authority over a licensed professional assigned to a court case and may prohibit the licensed professional from participating in future court proceedings. b. in addition to the requirements of section 32-201: 1. Attorneys and all licensed professionals who are assigned to a court case shall follow their code of conduct. 2. If a LICENSED PROFESSIONAL DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION a OF THIS SECTION believes that justice is not served or the public is not protected by a decision of the state bar of Arizona in a disciplinary proceeding, the person may request and SUBSEQUENTLY shall be provided a hearing in the superior court in the county of jurisdiction using the process described in paragraph 3 of this subsection that applies to attorneys and other licensed professionals who are assigned to a legal proceeding through any regulatory body under this title. The request shall be filed within forty-five days after the decision is rendered, and a new hearing shall be provided in superior court within forty-five days after the request is filed. 3. Mediation, including discussions and negotiations between the parties, is the preferred method of settling disputes relating to an attorney and a licensed professional who is assigned to a court case. Records of mediation or the fact that there has not been mediation shall be placed on the record for the judge and jury to consider. If mediation fails, a bench trial shall be conducted in superior court at which a judge shall examine the evidence and issue a ruling. If an attorney or the licensed professional believes the judicial ruling is unjust, the attorney or the licensed professional may demand and shall be furnished another bench trial with the same judge at which the evidence shall be examined and a jury verdict rendered. 4. In a hearing conducted pursuant to this section, a jury may: (a) Restore an attorney's or other licensed professional's license if the jury does not have more than two dissenting votes. (b) Revoke an attorney's or other licensed professional's license if the jury has a unanimous vote.END_STATUTE Sec. 2. Legislative findings and intent A. The legislature finds that: 1. Attorneys are currently officers of the court and members of the judicial branch. This places every attorney who is in the executive and legislative branches in violation of article III, Constitution of Arizona, relating to separation of powers. These attorneys are conflicted and do not work for the public. The public is getting bad legal advice as a result. 2. Psychologists, parenting coordinators and other professionals are not regulated after they are assigned to a court case with predictable results of no accountability. 3. The right to a hearing decided by a jury cannot be violated and no one has the discretion to violate this right. The right to have a jury make the final decision on attorney licensure and discipline is a fundamental liberty interest and is inviolate pursuant to article II, section 23, Constitution of Arizona. 4. The executive and legislative branches rely on sound, independent and competent legal advice with no conflict of interest with the judicial branch. 5. An independent judiciary is essential. Judges may not exert undue influence in the form of coercive control over the legal profession. B. The legislature intends to: 1. Protect the public from all licensed legal professionals who are assigned to a case and expected to follow a code of conduct. 2. Restore separation of powers. 3. Restore checks and balances and limits on the government's power that is now unlimited and causing immeasurable harm to the public. 4. Dispel the public perception that attorneys and judges may have formed an illegal monopoly and thus to reaffirm the integrity of both the judicial branch the legal profession.
6879
6980 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
7081
71-Section 1. Title 12, chapter 7, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding article 3, to read:
82+Section 1. Title 32, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding chapter 2, to read:
7283
73-ARTICLE 3. PROTECTED POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS BELIEFS
84+CHAPTER 2
7485
75-START_STATUTE12-851. Prohibited adverse actions; jurisdiction; civil, criminal or administrative action; definitions
86+ATTORNEYS AND COURT PROFESSIONALS
7687
77-A. A GOVERNMENT AGENT MAY NOT INITIATE, TAKE, CONDUCT, ASSIST, PARTICIPATE IN OR CONSPIRE TO HAVE UNDERTAKEN AN ADVERSE ACTION AGAINST ANY NATURAL PERSON IF a substantial motivation for THE GOVERNMENT AGENT'S DECISION TO DO SO IS MOTIVATED BY AN UNLAWFUL ANIMUS, EVEN IF THAT NATURAL PERSON WOULD OTHERWISE PROPERLY BE THE SUBJECT OF THE ADVERSE ACTION.
88+ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
7889
79-B. NO COURT IN THIS STATE HAS JURISDICTION OVER AN ADVERSE ACTION BROUGHT IN VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION. THE SUBJECT OF AN ADVERSE ACTION MAY OBJECT TO THE EXERCISE OF a court's JURISDICTION ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE ACTION is in violation of SUBSECTION A of this section. ON OBJECTION, THE COURT SHALL NOT ASSERT JURISDICTION UNLESS IT FINDS, BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT THE GOVERNMENT agent HAS NOT VIOLATED SUBSECTION A of this section.
90+START_STATUTE32-201. Attorneys; complaints; discipline; right to jury hearings; prohibitions; perjury
8091
81-C. ALL JUDGMENTS, CONVICTIONS, ORDERS, CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PENALTIES, SENTENCES AND DECISIONS RENDERED IN VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION A of this section SHALL be DELETED FROM ALL GOVERNMENT RECORDS AND DEEMED UNENFORCEABLE AND INVALID.
92+A. The supreme court may process complaints filed against an attorney and discipline an attorney through the state bar of Arizona. In disciplinary proceedings, the supreme court shall provide notice and an opportunity for a hearing pursuant to rules adopted by the supreme court and shall disclose the attorney's responses to the complainant.
8293
83-D. ANY NATURAL PERSON who is SUBJECT TO A VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION A of this section MAY RAISE THE ISSUE AT ANY TIME FOLLOWING the DISCOVERY OF the UNLAWFUL ANIMUS.
94+B. In addition to following the Arizona rules of professional conduct, an attorney shall:
8495
85-E. A CRIMINAL CONVICTION OR PENALTY that is IMPOSED IN VIOLATION OF SUBSECTION A of this section MAY BE RAISED PURSUANT TO section 13-4231, paragraph 2 EXCEPT THAT RELIEF MAY NOT BE PRECLUDED FOR THE FAILURE TO TIMELY RAISE THE ISSUE OR ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE ACCUSED CONSENTED TO JURISDICTION OF THE COURT.
96+1. Swear an oath to the United States constitution and the Arizona constitution and defend the rights of the ATTORNEY'S clients PURSUANT TO ARTICLE vi, CLAUSE 3, uNITED sTATES cONSTITUTION. Any other oath sWEaring allegiance to the court oR any ENTITY other than the constitution is void and prohibited.
8697
87-F. ANY EVIDENCE OBTAINED PURSUANT TO A SEARCH OR SEIZURE THAT IS IN VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS INADMISSIBLE IN ANY ADMINISTRATIVE, CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PROCEEDING.
98+2. Defend the rights of the attorney's clients, including article II, section 23, Constitution of Arizona, effectuated by the tenth amendment, United States Constitution.
8899
89-G. AN ARREST THAT IS MADE IN VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS INVALID.
100+C. If an attorney who is being investigated or disciplined by the state bar of Arizona believes that civil penalties, fines or discipline are excessive or unjust or that justice is not served by a decision of the state bar of Arizona in a disciplinary proceeding, within forty-five days after the decision the attorney may REQUEST and shall be provided a new hearing in superior court in the county of jurisdiction within forty-five days after the REQUEST.
90101
91-H. IF A GOVERNMENT AGENT VIOLATES SUBSECTION A OF THIS SECTION, THE natural PERSON WHOSE RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED MAY BRING A CAUSE OF ACTION IN STATE OR FEDERAL COURT AGAINST BOTH THE GOVERNMENT AGENT AND THE GOVERNMENT ENTITY THAT EMPLOYS OR CONTRACTS WITH THE GOVERNMENT AGENT, INCLUDING THIS STATE, EXCEPT THAT THIS STATE IS NOT SUBJECT TO A SUIT IN FEDERAL COURT. AN ACTION BROUGHT PURSUANT to THIS SUBSECTION SHALL BE COMMENCED WITHIN FOUR YEARS AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE, CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PROCEEDING OR INVESTIGATION THAT WAS MOTIVATED BY AN UNLAWFUL ANIMUS, INCLUDING ALL APPEALS. IT IS NOT A DEFENSE TO THE CAUSE OF ACTION THAT THE natural PERSON WHOSE RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED WOULD OTHERWISE PROPERLY BE THE SUBJECT OF THE ADVERSE ACTION OR THAT THE ADVERSE ACTION RESULTED IN AN ADVERSE JUDGMENT, DECISION, OPINION, VERDICT OR RULING AGAINST THE natural PERSON WHOSE RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED.
102+D. Mediation, including discussions and negotiations between the parties, is the preferred method of settling disputes relating to an attorney. Records of mediation or the fact that there has not been mediation shall be placed on the record for the judge and jury to consider. If mediation fails, a bench trial shall be conducted in superior court at which A JUDGE SHALL EXAMINE the evidence and ISSUE a ruling. If the attorney believes the judicial ruling is unjust, the attorney may demand and shall be furnished another bench trial with the same judge at which a jury shall examine evidence and render a verdict.
92103
93-I. IN ANY CAUSE OF ACTION FILED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION H OF THIS SECTION, A PREVAILING PLAINTIFF MAY RECOVER DECLARATORY RELIEF, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, NOMINAL DAMAGES, ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS.
104+E. Notwithstanding any other law, FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION a jury shall consist of ten citizens chosen at random from a jury pool. The jury may enter a verdict to disbar an attorney only by unanimous verdict using evidence that reaches the standard of clear and convincing. If the evidence does not reach this standard, the attorney shall remain licensed to practice law or have sanctions reduced as determined by the jury. Jury instructions shall include a copy of this section and the court record.
94105
95-J. Subsections H and I of this section do not apply to A peace officer who makes an arrest of a natural person who is subject to an adverse action in violation of subsection A of this section.
106+f. Perjury, providing false or manufactured evidence or withholding exculpatory evidence is prohibited and:
96107
97-K. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION:
108+1. Is punishable under title 13, chapter 27.
98109
99-1. "Adverse action":
110+2. Is a class 4 felony.
100111
101-(a) Means:
112+3. Shall be enforced in criminal court.
102113
103-(i) Any criminal or civil investigation or prosecution of any natural person.
114+4. A person may refer a violation of this subsection to the county attorney or the attorney general.
104115
105-(ii) Any proceeding of any sort that seeks any adverse administrative, civil or criminal action against any natural person.
116+g. Total fees for all subsequent hearingS DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION, INCLUDING a jury, may not exceed $500.
106117
107-(b) Does not include an action against a natural person in that natural person's official capacity.
118+h. Attorneys and court appointed professionals shall be verifiably noticed of the option to have a jury make the final decision for sanctions, including disbarment. Failure to notice shall render decisions made by the state bar of Arizona void and unenforceable requiring further proceedings to settle a dispute.
108119
109-2. "GOVERNMENT AGENT" MEANS ANY LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL OFFICIAL WHO IS EMPLOYED BY OR CONTRACTS WITH GOVERNMENT IN THIS STATE AT ANY LEVEL AND WHO IS ACTING IN THAT CAPACITY OR ANY MEMBER, EMPLOYEE OR CONTRACTOR OF A REGULATORY BOARD OR COMMISSION IN THIS STATE AT ANY LEVEL AND WHO IS ACTING IN THAT CAPACITY.
120+i. In a hearing pursuant to this section, a jury may sanction a party, including the state bar of Arizona, for misconduct in an amount of not more than $5,000, which may be paid to any party to the hearing.
110121
111-3. "UNLAWFUL ANIMUS" MEANS A DISAGREEMENT WITH OR DISLIKE OF A natural PERSON'S RELIGIOUS OR POLITICAL BELIEFS, POSITIONS, ASSOCIATIONS OR EXPRESSION. END_STATUTE
122+j. For decisions made by the state bar of Arizona before the effective date of this section, if the attorney did not explicitly waive the attorney's right to a jury, the attorney is entitled to a new hearing as prescribed in this section.END_STATUTE
112123
113-Sec. 2. Short title
124+START_STATUTE32-202. Licensed professionals; complaints; hearings; prohibitions
114125
115-This act may be cited as the "First Amendment Protection Act".
126+A. tHE supreme court shall exercise regulatory responsibility and authority over a licensed professional assigned to a court case and may prohibit the licensed professional from participating in future court proceedings.
127+
128+b. in addition to the requirements of section 32-201:
129+
130+1. Attorneys and all licensed professionals who are assigned to a court case shall follow their code of conduct.
131+
132+2. If a LICENSED PROFESSIONAL DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION a OF THIS SECTION believes that justice is not served or the public is not protected by a decision of the state bar of Arizona in a disciplinary proceeding, the person may request and SUBSEQUENTLY shall be provided a hearing in the superior court in the county of jurisdiction using the process described in paragraph 3 of this subsection that applies to attorneys and other licensed professionals who are assigned to a legal proceeding through any regulatory body under this title. The request shall be filed within forty-five days after the decision is rendered, and a new hearing shall be provided in superior court within forty-five days after the request is filed.
133+
134+3. Mediation, including discussions and negotiations between the parties, is the preferred method of settling disputes relating to an attorney and a licensed professional who is assigned to a court case. Records of mediation or the fact that there has not been mediation shall be placed on the record for the judge and jury to consider. If mediation fails, a bench trial shall be conducted in superior court at which a judge shall examine the evidence and issue a ruling. If an attorney or the licensed professional believes the judicial ruling is unjust, the attorney or the licensed professional may demand and shall be furnished another bench trial with the same judge at which the evidence shall be examined and a jury verdict rendered.
135+
136+4. In a hearing conducted pursuant to this section, a jury may:
137+
138+(a) Restore an attorney's or other licensed professional's license if the jury does not have more than two dissenting votes.
139+
140+(b) Revoke an attorney's or other licensed professional's license if the jury has a unanimous vote.END_STATUTE
141+
142+Sec. 2. Legislative findings and intent
143+
144+A. The legislature finds that:
145+
146+1. Attorneys are currently officers of the court and members of the judicial branch. This places every attorney who is in the executive and legislative branches in violation of article III, Constitution of Arizona, relating to separation of powers. These attorneys are conflicted and do not work for the public. The public is getting bad legal advice as a result.
147+
148+2. Psychologists, parenting coordinators and other professionals are not regulated after they are assigned to a court case with predictable results of no accountability.
149+
150+3. The right to a hearing decided by a jury cannot be violated and no one has the discretion to violate this right. The right to have a jury make the final decision on attorney licensure and discipline is a fundamental liberty interest and is inviolate pursuant to article II, section 23, Constitution of Arizona.
151+
152+4. The executive and legislative branches rely on sound, independent and competent legal advice with no conflict of interest with the judicial branch.
153+
154+5. An independent judiciary is essential. Judges may not exert undue influence in the form of coercive control over the legal profession.
155+
156+B. The legislature intends to:
157+
158+1. Protect the public from all licensed legal professionals who are assigned to a case and expected to follow a code of conduct.
159+
160+2. Restore separation of powers.
161+
162+3. Restore checks and balances and limits on the government's power that is now unlimited and causing immeasurable harm to the public.
163+
164+4. Dispel the public perception that attorneys and judges may have formed an illegal monopoly and thus to reaffirm the integrity of both the judicial branch the legal profession.