California Assembly Bill AB880 Amended / Bill

 BILL NUMBER: AB 880AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 22, 2012 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 10, 2011 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 25, 2011 INTRODUCED BY Assembly  Member   V. Manuel Prez   Members   Nestande   and V. Manuel Prez  FEBRUARY 17, 2011 An act to  amend Sections 21159 and 21159.1 of the Public Resources Code   add Section 1587 to the Fish and Game Code  , relating to  the environmental quality   ecological reserves  . LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 880, as amended,  V. Manuel Prez   Nestande  .  Environmental quality: CEQA: expedited environmental review.   Ecological reserves: Mirage Trail.   Existing law authorizes the Department of Fish and Game, with the approval of the Fish and Game Commission, to, among other things, maintain, use, and administer land suitable for the purpose of establishing ecological reserves. Existing law authorizes the Department of Fish and Game to construct facilities and conduct programs in ecological reserves to provide natural history education and recreation if those facilities and programs are compatible with the protection of the biological resources of the reserve.   This bill would require the department to open the Mirage Trail within the Magnesia Spring Ecological Reserve to hiking and biking recreational activities.   The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA authorizes the use of a focused environmental impact report for a project that consists solely of the installation of pollution control equipment or for a project that consists solely of the installation of that equipment or other components in compliance with the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.   Existing law requires specified state and local government agencies to perform a specified environmental analysis at the time of the adoption of a rule or regulation requiring the installation of pollution control equipment, or a performance standard or treatment requirement, including a rule or regulation that requires the installation of pollution control equipment or a performance standard or treatment requirement pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.   This bill would instead require that those agencies perform an environmental analysis of the reasonably foreseeable methods of compliance at the time of the adoption of a rule or regulation requiring the installation of pollution control equipment, or compliance with a performance standard or treatment requirement, including a rule or regulation that requires the installation of pollution control equipment or other direct emission reduction, or compliance with a performance standard or treatment requirement adopted pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.   This bill would also revise the circumstances under which a focused environmental impact report may be used for a project.  Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:  SECTION 1.   Section 1587 is added to the   Fish and Game Code  , to read:   1587. The department shall open the Mirage Trail within the Magnesia Spring Ecological Reserve to hiking and biking recreational activities.   SECTION 1.   Section 21159 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read: 21159. (a) An agency listed in Section 21159.4 shall perform an environmental analysis of the reasonably foreseeable methods of compliance at the time of the adoption of a rule or regulation requiring the installation of pollution control equipment, or compliance with a performance standard, or treatment requirement, including a rule or regulation that requires the installation of pollution control equipment or other direct emission reduction, or compliance with a performance standard or treatment requirement adopted pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) of the Health and Safety Code). In the preparation of this analysis, the agency may utilize numerical ranges or averages where specific data is not available; however, the agency shall not be required to engage in speculation or conjecture. The environmental analysis shall, at minimum, include all of the following: (1) An analysis of the reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts of the methods of compliance. (2) An analysis of reasonably foreseeable feasible mitigation measures. (3) An analysis of reasonably foreseeable alternative means of compliance with the rule or regulation. (4) For a rule or regulation adopted pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) of the Health and Safety Code) that requires the installation of pollution control equipment or other direct emission reduction, the analysis shall also include reasonably foreseeable greenhouse gas emission impacts of compliance with the rule or regulation. (b) The preparation of an environmental impact report at the time of adopting a rule or regulation pursuant to this division shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of this section. (c) The environmental analysis shall take into account a reasonable range of environmental, economic, and technical factors, population and geographic areas, and specific sites. (d) This section does not require the agency to conduct a project-level analysis. (e) For purposes of this article, the term "performance standard" includes process or raw material changes or product reformulation. (f) This section is not intended, and may not be used, to delay the adoption of any rule or regulation for which an analysis is required to be performed pursuant to this section.   SEC. 2.   Section 21159.1 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read: 21159.1. (a) A focused environmental impact report may be utilized if a project meets all of the following requirements: (1) The project consists solely of any of the following: (A) Installation of pollution control equipment required by a rule or regulation adopted by an agency listed in subdivision (a) of Section 21159.4 and the other components necessary to complete the installation of that equipment. (B) Installation of pollution control equipment and other components necessary to complete the installation of that equipment that reduces greenhouse gases, as required by a rule or regulation adopted by an agency listed in Section 21159.4 pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) of the Health and Safety Code). (C) Installation of direct emission reduction required by a rule or regulation adopted by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) of the Health and Safety Code). (2) The agency certifies an environmental impact report on the rule or regulation or reviews it pursuant to a certified regulatory program, and, in either case, the review includes an assessment of growth inducing impacts and cumulative impacts of, and alternatives to, the project. (3) The environmental review required by paragraph (2) is completed within five years of certification of the focused environmental impact report. (4) An environmental impact report is not required pursuant to Section 21166. (b) The discussion of significant effects on the environment in the focused environmental impact report shall be limited to project-specific potentially significant effects on the environment of the project that were not discussed in the environmental analysis of the rule or regulation required pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 21159. A discussion of growth-inducing impacts or cumulative impacts shall not be required in the focused environmental impact report, and the discussion of alternatives shall be limited to a discussion of alternative means of compliance, if any, with the rule or regulation.