California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1428

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
4/20/17  
Refer
5/17/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Report Pass
7/5/17  
Refer
7/6/17  
Refer
7/6/17  

Caption

Peace officers: transparency.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1428 would significantly amend existing laws under the Penal Code, specifically Sections 832.5 and 832.19. It would require law enforcement agencies to publish their procedures for handling complaints and to make records related to their disciplinary processes available for public inspection. Additionally, the bill mandates that departments report findings from officer-involved shootings and serious uses of force on a publicly accessible website, effectively enhancing public access to crucial data and fostering greater accountability within the law enforcement community.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1428, also known as the Peace Officers Transparency Act, aims to enhance transparency regarding the accountability of peace officers in California. The bill mandates that law enforcement agencies investigate complaints against their officers and requires them to provide complainants with updates regarding the status of their investigations every 45 days. Additionally, it establishes a framework for departments to create a mediation program to address complaints of biased policing, promoting communication between officers and the public while preserving confidentiality during mediation sessions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1428 is largely favorable among advocacy groups and community stakeholders who prioritize police accountability and transparency. Proponents argue that this legislation is a critical step towards restoring public trust in law enforcement agencies, which they view as essential for enhancing community relations and ensuring justice for individuals affected by police actions. However, some law enforcement representatives express concerns that the additional reporting requirements might impede operational efficiency and complicate the internal processes necessary for handling sensitive investigations.

Contention

The main points of contention revolve around the balance between transparency and officer confidentiality. Law enforcement agencies are hesitant about the potential impact of public disclosures on officer privacy and safety. Another significant issue is the potential financial burden on local agencies to implement the required procedures and reporting mechanisms, which may necessitate state reimbursement for costs incurred due to these mandates. Legislative discussions have highlighted a broader debate concerning the scope of policing reforms and the role of accountability in modern law enforcement practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1421

Peace officers: release of records.

CA AB2557

Peace officers: records.

CA AB847

Peace officers: confidentiality of records.

CA SB776

Peace officers: release of records.

CA SB16

Peace officers: release of records.

CA SB1220

Peace and custodial officers.

CA AB1599

Peace officers: investigations of misconduct.

CA AB1388

Law enforcement: settlement agreements.