Firearms: license to carry concealed.
By imposing these training requirements, AB2103 effectively creates a state-mandated local program that local licensing authorities must implement. The bill mandates that each licensing authority provide public standards for the live-fire exercises required during training, addressing the rising concerns about the competency of concealed carry permit holders. Additionally, the California Constitution stipulates that if this act imposes costs on local agencies, the state must reimburse those entities, which introduces an important fiscal consideration for the implementation of these new training protocols.
Assembly Bill No. 2103, known as AB2103, amends Section 26165 of the Penal Code to establish new training requirements for licenses to carry concealed firearms. This bill allows sheriffs and the heads of municipal police departments to issue licenses, contingent upon an applicant's moral character, good cause for issuance, and the completion of an approved training course. Under AB2103, the training course must last at least eight hours but no more than sixteen hours and must cover firearm safety, handling, shooting techniques, and relevant laws. Notably, the requirement for live-fire shooting exercises on a firing range is emphasized, ensuring that applicants demonstrate safe handling and shooting proficiency for each firearm they wish to carry.
The sentiment surrounding AB2103 appears to be mixed among stakeholders. Supporters of the bill, particularly those advocating for responsible firearm ownership, argue that increased training requirements can lead to safer communities by ensuring that license holders are proficient in handling firearms and understand the relevant laws. However, opponents express concern that additional training requirements could create barriers to obtaining a concealed carry license, which they believe may infringe upon Second Amendment rights and individual freedoms. This tension reflects a broader ongoing dialogue regarding gun rights and public safety.
A notable point of contention within the discussions of AB2103 is the balance it strikes between ensuring public safety through adequate training and potentially restricting lawful gun ownership. Critics argue that while the intent to enhance proficiency is commendable, the requirement for live-fire exercises may disproportionately impact low-income individuals or those unable to access such training facilities. Furthermore, the bill's provisions for local agencies to establish licensing standards may lead to varying interpretations and implementations throughout the state, which could complicate the concealed carry landscape.