Zero Traffic Fatalities Task Force.
The bill is significant in changing how speed limits are determined, particularly the existing reliance on the 85th percentile speed method in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. By requiring an analysis and possible recommendations for alternative methods of setting speed limits, the task force's work could lead to more tailored and safer traffic management strategies. Additionally, it sets a framework for collaboration between governmental entities, which could foster more innovative solutions to enhance traffic safety.
Assembly Bill 2363, known as the Zero Traffic Fatalities Task Force, establishes a dedicated task force aimed at reducing traffic fatalities in California. The bill specifies that the Secretary of Transportation must form the task force by July 1, 2019, which will involve various stakeholders, including representatives from governmental departments, academic institutions, and advocacy groups focused on transportation and safety. The task force's primary mission is to develop a coordinated approach for engaging all parties in efforts to establish and implement policies that strive for zero traffic fatalities.
The sentiment around AB 2363 is largely positive among traffic safety advocates and public health officials, as it signifies a proactive approach to addressing the serious issue of road safety and fatalities. However, there are underlying concerns regarding the implementation and effectiveness of the task force's recommendations, particularly in terms of how they might affect existing laws and community autonomy in local traffic regulations.
Some points of contention arise from the potential changes to how speed limits are enforced, particularly the task force's exploration of alternatives to the 85th percentile method. Critics may argue that deviating from this established standard might lead to inconsistencies in traffic laws across different regions, affecting enforcement and public compliance. Additionally, the impact of collective engagement in developing new policies could generate debate about the roles and influence of local governments versus state authorities in determining traffic regulations.