California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB247

Introduced
1/30/17  
Refer
2/6/17  
Report Pass
2/27/17  
Report Pass
2/27/17  
Refer
2/28/17  
Refer
2/28/17  
Report Pass
3/8/17  
Report Pass
3/8/17  
Refer
3/13/17  
Refer
3/13/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Report Pass
7/10/17  
Report Pass
7/10/17  
Refer
7/11/17  
Refer
7/11/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Vetoed
10/13/17  

Caption

Public health: childhood lead poisoning: Lead Advisory Task Force.

Impact

The formation of the Lead Advisory Task Force is expected to have significant implications for California's approach to childhood lead poisoning. The task force will evaluate existing state and county programs related to lead testing, drinking water safety, and healthy housing initiatives. Furthermore, it will address and review regulatory provisions to enhance the protection of children's health, aligning state measures with evolving federal guidelines on lead toxicity. The regular updates of its regulatory agenda aim to ensure that California remains vigilant against lead hazards and adapts its standards to emerging scientific insights.

Summary

Assembly Bill 247 establishes a Lead Advisory Task Force to address public health concerns related to childhood lead poisoning in California. Under the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Act of 1991, this bill mandates the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment to convene the task force, which is required to consist of experts from various fields, including epidemiology, occupational health, and environmental justice. The task force aims to develop and publish a regulatory agenda that identifies sources of lead exposure and suggests protective health measures by April 1, 2020.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 247 appears to be positive, as it addresses a crucial public health issue with the potential to improve safety for children in California. Advocates for children's health and safety entities are likely to support the task force's establishment, viewing it as a proactive step toward reducing lead exposure. Furthermore, there is recognition among legislators of the importance of addressing lead poisoning comprehensively, which reflects a growing concern for public health and environmental safety.

Contention

While there seems to be a general agreement on the necessity of combating childhood lead poisoning, potential contention might arise regarding the appropriate methods for regulation and resource allocation. Some industry representatives and local government officials might express concerns about the implications of stricter regulations on economic activities related to lead production and use. The ability of the task force to effectively balance health concerns with economic considerations will be critical to its operations and overall effectiveness.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1041

Childhood lead poisoning prevention.

CA AB1316

Public health: childhood lead poisoning: prevention.

CA SB230

State Water Resources Control Board: Constituents of Emerging Concern in Drinking Water Program.

CA AB362

Water policy: California tribal communities.