California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3233

Introduced
2/16/18  
Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/12/18  
Report Pass
4/17/18  
Report Pass
4/17/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Report Pass
4/30/18  
Refer
5/2/18  
Refer
5/16/18  
Refer
5/16/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Report Pass
7/3/18  
Refer
7/5/18  
Refer
8/6/18  

Caption

Pupil assessment: grade II: reported as local academic indicator.

Impact

The introduction of AB 3233 is expected to enhance the methods through which academic performance indicators are reported at the state level. By specifically addressing grade 11 assessments, the bill intends to ensure that schools provide a more comprehensive overview of their student performance metrics. This change could lead local educational agencies to better understand how their students are performing relative to both state benchmarks and other local agencies. It may also necessitate adjustments within schools to meet the new reporting requirements, impacting educational governance and oversight at various levels.

Summary

Assembly Bill 3233, introduced by Assembly Member Kiley, proposes an amendment to the California Education Code to establish new performance standards for grade 11 assessments. If passed, the bill mandates that performance results from specific assessments be incorporated into the California School Dashboard. This dashboard serves as a public interface for displaying school performance data based on state evaluation rubrics. By integrating these results, AB 3233 aims to improve the transparency and reporting of educational outcomes in California schools.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 3233 appears to be supportive among educational stakeholders who believe it will enhance accountability and transparency. Proponents argue that these changes are necessary to better reflect student performance, particularly at a critical juncture in their educational journey. However, there may be some concerns regarding the implementation details and the administrative burden it places on local educational agencies as they transition to these new requirements.

Contention

While there is considerable support for the bill, some points of contention have emerged, particularly regarding the feasibility of integrating new performance indicators into the existing California School Dashboard. Opponents might raise questions about resources, training, and funding necessary to effectively administer these new assessment standards. Furthermore, discussions may involve debates over the potential impact on teaching practices and student assessment procedures, as schools adjust to comply with the bill's requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1357

School accountability: college and career readiness indicators: culminating performance assessment.

CA SB540

Pupil instruction: improving pupil success: grant program.

CA SB720

Environmental education: environmental principles and concepts.

CA AB1097

Pupil instruction: credit recovery programs: report.

CA AB398

COVID-19 Local Government and School Recovery and Relief Act.

CA AB2723

The California Cradle-to-Career Data System Act.

CA AB237

Intradistrict and interdistrict transfers: low-performing pupils.

CA AB99

School safety: crisis intervention and targeted violence prevention program.