The bill reflects a significant legislative effort to address California's ongoing water scarcity issues exacerbated by long-term drought and climate change. By promoting potable reuse, it aligns with the state's goal of increasing recycled water use, aiming to deliver at least 1 million acre-feet of additional water supplies by 2020 and 2 million by 2030. It also transfers responsibilities related to water quality standards back to the State Water Resources Control Board, enhancing central oversight on public health protection linked to recycled water projects.
Assembly Bill No. 574, introduced by Quirk, aims to enhance water recycling practices in California by establishing uniform criteria for potable reuse. The bill amends Sections 13560 and 13561 of the Water Code and adds new sections to streamline the process of adopting these standards. Notably, it requires the State Water Resources Control Board to adopt uniform water recycling criteria for direct potable reuse by December 31, 2023. This includes defining terms related to water augmentation and setting up a framework that ensures the protection of public health through regulated practices.
The sentiment surrounding AB 574 appears largely supportive among legislators, emphasizing the necessity of developing a reliable framework for potable reuse. Proponents argue that the bill is crucial for sustainable water management and reflects a proactive approach to adapting to changing environmental conditions. However, it also raises concerns among environmental advocates and community stakeholders about the adequacy of health protections and the thoroughness of regulatory processes related to recycled water.
Key points of contention relate to the establishment of the expert review panel that will guide the development of recycling criteria. Critics question whether enough consideration has been given to the potential health risks associated with direct potable reuse and whether the proposed timelines allow for sufficient stakeholder input and research. Additionally, there is concern regarding how the uniform criteria might impact local water agencies’ discretion in managing water quality and protecting public health.