California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB623

Introduced
2/14/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/27/17  
Refer
4/27/17  
Refer
4/27/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Report Pass
7/3/17  
Report Pass
7/3/17  
Refer
7/5/17  
Refer
7/5/17  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Report Pass
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/13/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Refer
6/20/18  

Caption

Autonomous vehicles: accident and incident reporting.

Impact

If enacted, AB623 would amend existing environmental regulations to require more comprehensive pollution reporting from industries. This change would enhance the state's ability to monitor and mitigate environmental risks effectively, addressing concerns about air and water quality. The bill has the potential to lead to improved public health outcomes, particularly in communities situated near industrial areas that have historically faced exposure to hazardous emissions. However, the increase in reporting requirements may also place additional burdens on businesses, prompting discussions around regulatory compliance and operational costs.

Summary

AB623 is a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing environmental safeguards by mandating stricter reporting requirements for certain pollutants emitted by industries. The bill seeks to improve transparency regarding environmental impacts and ensure that the public is better informed about potential hazards associated with industrial activities. Supporters advocate for the bill as a necessary step towards protecting public health and the environment, emphasizing the need for clearer information on industrial emissions that could affect communities and ecosystems.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB623 appears to lean towards support from environmental advocacy groups and public health advocates who argue that enhanced reporting can lead to greater accountability and cleaner environments. In contrast, some industry representatives have expressed concerns about the increased regulatory burden, viewing it as an obstacle to business operations. The discussions reflect a common tension between the necessity for environmental protection and the implications for industry regulations, leading to a complex debate on striking a balance between public health and economic interests.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the extent of the reporting requirements and the potential financial implications for businesses. Critics of the bill highlight the possibility that the added compliance costs may disproportionately affect smaller businesses, potentially hindering their competitiveness in the market. Additionally, there are discussions regarding the effectiveness of the proposed measures and whether they would result in meaningful environmental improvements or simply add layers of bureaucratic oversight without substantial benefits.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB500

Autonomous vehicles: zero emissions.

CA AB1201

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.

CA SB511

Autonomous vehicles.

CA AB33

Autonomous vehicles.

CA AB1160

Autonomous vehicles.

CA AB316

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.

CA SB480

Autonomous vehicles.

CA AB2286

Vehicles: autonomous vehicles.