California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB791

Introduced
2/15/17  
Introduced
2/15/17  
Refer
3/20/17  
Refer
3/20/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Refer
5/10/17  

Caption

Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: State Water Project and federal Central Valley Project: new conveyance facility.

Impact

The implications of AB 791 are aimed at ensuring that water contracts are handled with a focus on detailed financial obligations and benefits for each contractor. By ensuring that each contractor is aware of the costs and benefits associated with their financial contributions to the new Delta conveyance facilities, the bill seeks to create a more equitable and clear understanding among stakeholders. This is particularly relevant in light of ongoing concerns regarding water rights, environmental outcomes, and the management of Californian water resources.

Summary

Assembly Bill 791, introduced by Assembly Member Frazier, focuses on the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and stipulates requirements for the construction of new conveyance facilities that are part of the State Water Project and the federal Central Valley Project. The bill aims to amend specific provisions of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009. Its major proposal is to mandate that any contracts established by water contractors for funding the new facilities include precise breakdowns of costs and specified benefits. This requirement is intended to provide greater transparency and accountability in the financial commitments made by water contractors involved in such projects.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding the bill is mixed. Supporters view this legislation as a necessary step towards improving transparency in water management processes and ensuring that financial responsibilities are clearly defined. Conversely, some stakeholders may express concern about potential bureaucratic delays introduced by these additional requirements, fearing they could hinder timely progress on critical water infrastructure projects. Discussions in the legislature indicate a need for balance between environmental accountability and operational efficiency in water resource development.

Contention

Notable points of contention concerning AB 791 revolve around the perceived impact of increased regulatory requirements. Critics argue that mandating a detailed breakdown of costs and benefits may complicate negotiations and extend timelines for project initiation. Supporters counter that such measures are vital for fostering trust and collaboration among contractors and mitigating potential disputes over funding and resource allocation in the future.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB777

State property: transfer: University of California.

CA SB204

State Water Project: contracts.

CA SB626

Department of Water Resources: Procurement Methods.

CA SB739

Construction manager at-risk construction contracts: City of Elk Grove: zoo project.

CA AB1223

Local Transportation Authority and Improvement Act: Sacramento Transportation Authority.

CA SB1227

Real property development: San Francisco: downtown revitalization zone: welfare tax exemption and California Environmental Quality Act exemption and streamlining.

CA SB791

California Surplus Land Unit.

CT HB07055

An Act Concerning Recommendations By The Department Of Transportation Regarding The Notification Of State Construction Contract Opportunities By The University Of Connecticut And The Commissioner Of Transportation, Parking Spaces, Wayside Horns, The Disposition Of Excess State Property, Heavy Duty Trailers, Flashing Lights On Motor Vehicles, Child Restraint Systems, Pesticide Application By Railroad Companies, The "move Over" Law, Road Design Standards, And Road And Bridge Designations.