California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill ACR32

Introduced
3/13/17  
Introduced
3/13/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
5/31/17  
Refer
5/31/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Refer
6/28/17  
Refer
6/28/17  
Refer
7/10/17  
Refer
7/10/17  
Enrolled
9/11/17  
Enrolled
9/11/17  
Chaptered
9/19/17  
Chaptered
9/19/17  
Passed
9/19/17  

Caption

Community colleges: faculty.

Impact

The resolution aims to catalyze a comprehensive reassessment of hiring practices within California's community college system. It emphasizes the need for equitable treatment of part-time faculty, promoting the concept of equal pay for equal work. If successful, the initiatives resulting from this resolution could lead to significant changes in staffing, budget allocations, and the overall educational experience for students, reflecting a system more reliant on qualified full-time faculty, thereby enhancing educational outcomes.

Summary

ACR32 is an Assembly Concurrent Resolution introduced to affirm the importance of hiring full-time faculty at California's community colleges. It acknowledges the precarious position of part-time faculty, who have historically been under-supported and inadequately compensated despite their contributions to educational standards. The resolution calls for the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to collaborate with stakeholders to create viable proposals aimed at improving these conditions and addressing the long-standing goal of ensuring that at least 75% of credit instruction is delivered by full-time faculty. Currently, the situation is far from this ideal, with the latest statistic showing only 56.4% of classroom teaching conducted by full-time instructors.

Sentiment

General sentiment around ACR32 appears overwhelmingly supportive, as it addresses pressing needs within the community college system. Stakeholders, including educators and advocates for educational equity, have welcomed the attention directed towards achieving equitable compensation and job security for part-time faculty. However, some concerns remain about the feasibility of implementing such proposals given existing budgetary constraints and institutional resistance to change. The discussions around the resolution have reignited debates about the roles of part-time versus full-time faculty in higher education.

Contention

Notable points of contention during discussions include the challenges in achieving the goal of 75% of instruction delivered by full-time faculty, as well as the financial implications for community colleges in meeting this target. Critics have raised concerns about the sustainability of funding proposals that may emerge from the resolution, particularly regarding how they may affect institutional budgets and existing faculty contracts. Moreover, there is an ongoing tension between maintaining operational flexibility in hiring practices and ensuring the quality of education delivered to students.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2617

Pupil instruction: dual enrollment programs: competitive grants: College and Career Access Pathways partnerships: best practices: communication and marketing strategy.

CA AB1326

Public social services: county liaison for higher education.

CA AB988

Pupil instruction: statewide dual enrollment framework: advisory board.

CA SB711

Community colleges: blockchain industry report.

CA AB130

Postsecondary education: Higher Education Performance, Accountability, and Coordination Commission.

CA AB992

Peace officers.

CA AB942

CalFresh: Restaurant Meals Program.

CA AB103

Pupil instruction: College and Career Access Pathways partnerships: best practices: communication and marketing strategy.