California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1022

Introduced
2/7/18  
Introduced
2/7/18  
Refer
2/14/18  
Refer
2/14/18  
Refer
3/14/18  
Refer
3/14/18  
Refer
4/12/18  
Refer
4/12/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Engrossed
5/10/18  
Engrossed
5/10/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Report Pass
8/8/18  
Report Pass
8/8/18  
Enrolled
8/16/18  
Enrolled
8/16/18  
Chaptered
9/23/18  
Chaptered
9/23/18  
Passed
9/23/18  

Caption

Public Employees’ Retirement System: administration.

Impact

The implications of SB 1022 are significant for public employees and the agencies that administer their benefits. The bill establishes clear protocols for handling confidential information, thus enhancing the operational integrity of the PERS. It mandates that when a contracting agency intends to terminate a retirement contract, there are structured notification requirements, ensuring that past and present employees are adequately informed about significant changes that could affect their benefits. This aspect of the bill serves both to protect employees' interests and to prevent potential misinformation during transitions.

Summary

Senate Bill 1022, introduced by Senator Pan, seeks to amend parts of the Government Code related to the administration of the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). The bill focuses on the confidentiality of data filed by members and beneficiaries with the Board of Administration, extending protections to information related to the Public Employees Medical and Hospital Care Act. By ensuring that only authorized entities have access to this data, the bill aims to safeguard the personal information of public employees and their beneficiaries, promoting trust in the administrative processes of retirement systems.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 1022 appears to be generally positive, particularly among proponents who value the enhanced privacy measures for public employees. The sentiment echoes a broader trend in legislative discussions emphasizing the preservation of employee rights and informed participation. However, there remains a critical viewpoint regarding potential bureaucratic hurdles that could arise from the implementation of the notification requirements, which could be seen as cumbersome by some stakeholders.

Contention

One notable point of contention within discussions surrounding SB 1022 is the potential administrative burden that could be placed on contracting agencies when implementing the notification processes outlined in the bill. Critics might argue that while protecting employee data is vital, the requirements for timely communication and the responsibilities placed on agencies to maintain accurate contact information could lead to challenges. This aspect of SB 1022 signals a significant shift in how agencies manage their administrative processes and employee relations, which may be met with varying levels of acceptance across different sectors.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1166

Public Employees’ Retirement System: contracting agency: contributions.

CA AB2100

Medi-Cal: pharmacy benefits.

LA SB8

Provides relative to the state's fiscal transparency website's establishment, completion, and contents. (Item #11)(7/1/18) (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)

LA SB363

Provides relative to the state's fiscal transparency website's establishment, completion, and contents. (7/1/18) (OR1 INCREASE GF EX See Note)

LA SB13

Provides relative to reporting of state expenditures through the fiscal transparency website. (Item #32) (7/1/18) (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)

LA HB597

Provides for a portal to provide comprehensive financial and other information to the public (EN -$3,500,000 GF RV See Note)

CA AB1688

Community health services: California Mental Health Planning Council, California Children’s Services program, Alameda County pilot program, and Medi-Cal managed care.

IL SB3130

INSURANCE-VARIOUS