California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB466

Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Report Pass
5/8/17  
Engrossed
5/22/17  
Refer
6/5/17  
Report Pass
6/13/17  
Refer
6/13/17  
Report Pass
7/11/17  
Enrolled
7/18/17  
Chaptered
7/31/17  

Caption

Rental passenger vehicle transactions: electronic surveillance technology: AMBER Alert.

Impact

The bill's amendment to Section 1939.23 of the Civil Code marks a significant change in how rental vehicle transactions are governed, particularly in cases involving law enforcement. By permitting the use of electronic surveillance technology under specified circumstances, the legislation seeks to improve the chances of recovering vehicles that may be used in criminal activities, particularly those related to child abductions. However, the measure also requires rental companies to notify law enforcement immediately if their vehicle is involved in an AMBER Alert, ensuring heightened accountability and communication between rental companies and authorities.

Summary

Senate Bill 466, known as the 'Rental Passenger Vehicle Transactions: Electronic Surveillance Technology: AMBER Alert,' primarily concerns the use of electronic surveillance technology by rental car companies. The bill modifies existing law which typically restricts rental companies from using, accessing, or obtaining any data related to a renter's use of the vehicle through such technology. Specifically, it introduces provisions that allow rental companies to use this technology in scenarios where their vehicles are implicated in an AMBER Alert. This legislative change aims to enhance law enforcement's ability to respond quickly in child abduction cases.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 466 appears to be generally positive, especially among proponents who prioritize child safety. Supporters argue that the bill provides necessary tools that could aid in swift action during critical situations involving missing children. Conversely, concerns have been raised regarding privacy implications and the extent of surveillance permitted by rental companies, suggesting that there could be reservations about the potential overreach in monitoring renter activity. This highlights a balancing act between public safety and individual privacy rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 466 revolve around the permitted use of surveillance technology for AMBER Alerts. While the intention behind the bill is to enhance the efficacy of emergency responses, critics argue that it may lead to potential abuses of surveillance as companies now have more flexibility to track their vehicles. Important stipulations of the bill also require clear documentation on how information from such surveillance is to be handled, including maintaining records for at least 12 months, which aims to safeguard against misuse.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB391

Leased and rented vehicles: embezzlement and theft.

CA AB2741

Rental car companies: electronic surveillance technology.

CA AB2620

Rental passenger vehicle transactions.

CA AB1185

Rental passenger vehicles.

CA AB1197

Rental passenger vehicles: electronic surveillance technology: renter liability for loss due to theft.

CA AB2658

Secretary of the Government Operations Agency: working group: blockchain technology.

CA AB882

Electronic court reporting.

CA SB1445

Electric mobility manufacturers.