California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB550

Introduced
2/16/17  
Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/28/17  
Refer
3/28/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Report Pass
5/8/17  
Report Pass
5/8/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
6/12/17  
Refer
6/12/17  
Report Pass
6/21/17  
Report Pass
6/21/17  
Refer
6/22/17  
Refer
6/27/17  
Refer
6/27/17  
Report Pass
7/18/17  
Report Pass
7/18/17  
Enrolled
9/12/17  
Enrolled
9/12/17  
Enrolled
9/12/17  
Chaptered
10/14/17  
Chaptered
10/14/17  
Passed
10/14/17  

Caption

Public school employment: meeting and negotiating: legal actions: settlement offer: attorney’s fees.

Impact

The impact of SB 550 is significant; it allows employee organizations to present offers to settle disputes regarding employer obligations, which could enhance the resolution process within public school settings. If an employer fails to accept a reasonable settlement offer and then does not achieve a better outcome in court, they may be obligated to pay the employee organization for reasonable attorney fees incurred after the offer was made. Such provisions might discourage employers from refusing fair settlement offers, thereby fostering a more cooperative negotiation environment.

Summary

Senate Bill 550, authored by Senator Pan, modifies the provisions related to public school employment, specifically regarding employees' rights to negotiate and settle disputes. It amends Section 3543.8 of the Government Code, ensuring that public school employees retain the right to form and participate in employee organizations for their representation. One key change introduced by this bill is the allowance for these organizations to make settlement offers to employers concerning disputes related to wages, benefits, or working conditions mandated by state law. This aims to streamline negotiations and potentially resolve issues before they escalate to formal legal proceedings.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 550 tends to be supportive among educational employees and their advocates, as it enhances their bargaining power and protection under state law. However, there are potential concerns regarding the implications for employers, particularly relating to increased financial liabilities when disputes arise. Proponents view the bill as a necessary measure to secure fair treatment for educators and staff, while opponents might caution against the added burdens placed on employers and the administrative processes surrounding these negotiations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance of power between public school employees and their employers, as well as concerns over how these procedural changes might be implemented in practice. Critics could argue that the enhancements in employees' rights could lead to increased litigation or financial strain on school districts, particularly if the conditions of the settlements are challenging to meet. Furthermore, there may be debates on the adequacy of existing safeguards in protecting against possible abuse of these legal provisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VA SB341

Common interest communities; foreclosure remedy.

VA HB880

Common interest communities; foreclosure remedy.

VA SB1428

Common interest communities; foreclosure remedy.

CA AB359

In-custody informants.

VA SB506

Higher educational institutions, public; duties and powers of governing board.

CA AB2527

Securities transactions: qualification requirements, exemptions, and liability.

CA AB1517

Securities transactions: qualifications by permit: liability.

CA AB2069

Securities transactions: qualification requirements, exemptions, and liability.