California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1327

Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/11/19  
Refer
3/11/19  
Report Pass
3/27/19  
Report Pass
3/27/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Report Pass
4/3/19  
Report Pass
4/3/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Engrossed
5/2/19  
Refer
5/2/19  
Refer
5/2/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Report Pass
8/22/19  
Refer
8/22/19  
Refer
8/22/19  
Report Pass
8/1/20  
Report Pass
8/1/20  
Refer
8/1/20  
Refer
8/1/20  
Refer
8/13/20  
Refer
8/13/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Refer
8/30/20  
Refer
8/30/20  
Refer
8/31/20  
Refer
8/31/20  
Enrolled
8/31/20  
Enrolled
8/31/20  
Vetoed
9/29/20  

Caption

Medi-Cal: reimbursement rates.

Impact

The impact of AB 1327 is significant for the operation of clinical laboratories that provide services under the Medi-Cal program. By removing the 80% cap based on Medicare's lowest allowance, the legislation presents an opportunity for the state to create reimbursement rates that are potentially higher and more reflective of current market conditions. This could enhance the financial viability of clinical laboratories, which are essential for providing health care services to low-income individuals, and could lead to improved access to necessary laboratory services as providers may operate more sustainably.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1327, introduced by Assembly Member Petrie-Norris, focuses on the Medi-Cal program, specifically on the reimbursement rates for clinical laboratory services. This bill modifies existing laws to eliminate the requirement that the reimbursement rate to providers cannot exceed 80% of the lowest maximum allowance established by the federal Medicare Program. The changes are intended to allow the California Department of Health Care Services more flexibility in developing and adjusting reimbursement rates based on a broader range of payment amounts received by providers from other payers, rather than sticking to strict adherence to the federal standard.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be supportive among healthcare providers who believe that more flexible reimbursement rates would lead to higher compensation for services rendered. Proponents argue that this is a necessary adjustment to ensure that the Medi-Cal program remains competitive in attracting and retaining clinical laboratories, which are vital for comprehensive healthcare delivery in California. However, there may be opposition from budget-conscious lawmakers or groups concerned about the potential increase in state expenditures resulting from higher reimbursement rates.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns that the removal of the specific cap could lead to potential overspending by the state on Medi-Cal reimbursements without adequate oversight. Additionally, stakeholders may worry about how changes in reimbursement rates will affect the state's ability to negotiate effectively with healthcare providers. The need for transparency in the process of developing these new rates and ensuring that they remain compliant with federal Medicaid standards is also highlighted, as the implementation of these changes depends on obtaining federal approvals.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB265

Medi-Cal: reimbursement rates.

CA AB601

Medi-Cal: reimbursement.

CA AB659

Medi-Cal: reimbursement rates.

CA SB339

Medi-Cal: laboratory rates.

CA SB1191

Medi-Cal: pharmacogenomic testing.

CA SB912

Biomarker testing.

CA SB1234

Family Planning, Access, Care, and Treatment Program.

CA SB306

Sexually transmitted disease: testing.