California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1394

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Report Pass
4/22/19  
Report Pass
4/22/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Report Pass
4/30/19  
Engrossed
5/6/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Refer
5/6/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Report Pass
6/3/19  
Report Pass
6/3/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Report Pass
6/11/19  
Refer
6/11/19  
Refer
6/11/19  
Refer
6/24/19  
Refer
6/24/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/9/19  
Enrolled
9/9/19  
Chaptered
10/8/19  
Chaptered
10/8/19  

Caption

Juveniles: sealing of records.

Impact

The passage of AB 1394 has several notable implications for state laws. Primarily, it not only eases the financial burden on individuals seeking to seal their records but also aligns with contemporary views on rehabilitation, acknowledging that past juvenile offenses should not permanently hinder a person's future. The repeal of the requirement for individuals aged 26 and older to bear the costs associated with sealing, unless indigent, shifts the responsibility away from them and supports a more supportive legal framework for youths.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1394, authored by Assemblymember Daly, aims to amend the Welfare and Institutions Code concerning the sealing of juvenile court records. The bill prohibits superior courts and probation departments from charging applicants fees when filing petitions to seal their juvenile records. This is significant because it reduces the financial barrier for individuals seeking to clear their past records, thus promoting opportunities for rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1394 was largely positive, reflecting a growing awareness and legislative focus on juvenile justice reform. Proponents of the bill expressed relief that it would foster a more equitable system for young individuals who may otherwise be hindered by past mistakes. Nonetheless, there were concerns about ensuring the continued accountability of juvenile systems without fees, suggesting that discussions may have included caution about balancing access with essential administrative needs.

Contention

Notable points of contention likely arose regarding the implications of removing all fees associated with the sealing process. Critics may have voiced concerns regarding potential challenges to the administrative capacities of the courts and probation departments, questioning whether the removal of these fees would compromise the thoroughness of record sealing procedures. Despite these concerns, the overarching goal of the bill aligns with rehabilitative justice, emphasizing the need to provide juveniles a chance to move beyond their past.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A386

Provides parties offering public remarks before Senate committees concerning qualifications of Superior Court judge nominees, upon motion, change of venue on family actions, to vicinage other than vicinage where nominee is assigned if confirmed.

NJ A1394

Provides parties offering public remarks before Senate committees concerning qualifications of Superior Court judge nominees, upon motion, change of venue on family actions, to vicinage other than vicinage where nominee is assigned if confirmed.

TX SB1047

Relating to the eligibility of an innovation and commercialization organization associated with the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center to receive funding from the Texas emerging technology fund.

CA SB1208

Courts, judicial emergencies.

CA AB3366

Judicial emergencies.

CT HB05388

An Act Concerning Court Fees And The Delivery Of Legal Services To The Poor.

CT SB00428

An Act Concerning Funding Of Legal Services For The Poor.

CA AB253

Remote court reporting.