California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB309

Introduced
1/29/19  
Introduced
1/29/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Refer
2/21/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Engrossed
5/13/19  
Engrossed
5/13/19  
Refer
5/14/19  
Refer
5/14/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Report Pass
6/17/19  
Report Pass
6/17/19  
Refer
6/17/19  
Refer
6/17/19  
Report Pass
7/1/19  
Report Pass
7/1/19  
Refer
7/2/19  
Refer
7/2/19  
Enrolled
8/26/19  
Enrolled
8/26/19  
Chaptered
9/6/19  
Chaptered
9/6/19  
Passed
9/6/19  

Caption

Vehicles that appear to be used by law enforcement: ownership or operation by public historical society or museum.

Impact

The passage of AB 309 has implications for how historical vehicles are treated under state law, particularly light bars and paint schemes that mimic law enforcement vehicles. Previously, individuals could face penalties for owning or operating such vehicles except in narrowly defined scenarios, like film production. With this amendment, museums and societies can legally maintain these vehicles for educational purposes, thereby enhancing public access to historical artifacts. However, this change also necessitates strict adherence to guidelines ensuring that the vehicles cannot be mistaken by the public as active law enforcement units.

Summary

Assembly Bill 309, introduced by Maisenschein, amends existing Vehicle Code sections to allow certain vehicles that resemble law enforcement vehicles to be owned and operated by public historical societies or museums. Under this bill, these vehicles must meet specific criteria, including being secured from unauthorized operation and only being operated under defined conditions, such as during approved public events or if they are older than twenty-five years. This change aims to enable historical organizations to preserve and exhibit these vehicles without infringing existing state laws that typically prohibit ownership of vehicles that can be mistaken for law enforcement cars.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 309 appears to be largely positive, with proponents arguing that the bill facilitates cultural preservation and public education. Supporters express that this measure enables historical societies and museums to better engage the community while promoting appreciation for the history of law enforcement vehicles. The modifications also seem to be welcomed by organizations focused on historical preservation, as it reduces the legal hurdles they previously faced. Nevertheless, some concern about potential misinterpretation of these vehicles by the general public remains, prompting discussion on the importance of maintaining distinctiveness from active law enforcement cars.

Contention

While many appreciate the intent of AB 309, there is contention surrounding the bill's potential for confusion among the public, leading to ambiguous situations where a vehicle may be mistaken for a working law enforcement unit. The conditions under which these replicas can be operated are designed to mitigate this risk. However, establishing a clear line between historical preservation and current law enforcement activity will be crucial in ensuring that the intent of the bill is upheld without compromising public safety or trust.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3410

Relating to Texas Department of Motor Vehicles and county tax assessor-collector vehicle titling and registration duties and fees associated with those duties.

TX SB1621

Relating to Texas Department of Motor Vehicles and county tax assessor-collector vehicle titling and registration duties and fees associated with those duties.

TX SB1507

Relating to motor vehicles; providing penalties.

SC H3126

SC Dept. of Law Enforcement and Public Safety; created

TX SB1402

Relating to motor vehicles; providing penalties.

TX HB2357

Relating to motor vehicles; providing penalties.

TX HB2741

Relating to the regulation of motor vehicles by counties and the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles; authorizing a fee; creating an offense.