California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB335

Introduced
1/31/19  
Introduced
1/31/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
3/11/19  
Report Pass
3/11/19  
Refer
3/12/19  
Refer
3/12/19  
Report Pass
3/27/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Engrossed
4/29/19  
Refer
4/29/19  
Refer
5/8/19  
Report Pass
6/11/19  
Enrolled
6/18/19  
Chaptered
6/26/19  
Passed
6/26/19  

Caption

Imperial County Transportation Commission.

Impact

The bill empowers the Imperial County Transportation Commission to collaborate with local agencies in coordinating and implementing various initiatives. While transportation funds are strictly allocated, the commission is authorized to develop and implement certain non-transportation programs aimed at providing local benefits, such as emergency response services and waste management initiatives. This approach seeks to enhance regional cooperation and resource-sharing among agencies, ultimately leading to better service delivery in the community.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 335, introduced by Eduardo Garcia, amends the Public Utilities Code to modify the functioning of the Imperial County Transportation Commission. Primarily, the bill restricts the use of transportation funds to only those expenses directly related to transportation planning and programming. This significant limitation is designed to ensure that financial resources are allocated appropriately and not diverted to non-transportation-related initiatives, which can lead to inefficiencies and mismanagement of funds.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 335 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Supporters argue that limiting the use of transportation funds will streamline the commission's operations and ensure that local needs are addressed without compromise. However, there are some concerns that restricting funding may inhibit the commission’s ability to innovate or respond comprehensively to local crises that may require a more integrated approach.

Contention

Notably, one contentious aspect of the bill is the delineation between transportation and non-transportation programs. Critics worry that while the focus on transportation is commendable, the strict separation may hinder integrated solutions to problems that do not neatly fit into defined categories, such as concurrent issues in public safety and environment management during disasters like floods or earthquakes. The requirement for a majority vote for implementing non-transportation programs can also create potential bureaucratic delays in urgent situations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00416

An Act Concerning The Department Of Public Health's Recommendations Regarding Advanced Emergency Medical Technicians.

MT SB518

Transfer licensing of emergency medical providers to the department of labor and industry

ME LD1530

An Act to Improve the Sustainability of Emergency Medical Services in Maine

ME LD526

An Act to Amend the Laws Governing the Emergency Medical Services Stabilization and Sustainability Program

CT HB07278

An Act Concerning Mobile Integrated Health Care.

FL H1321

Advanced Life Support Nontransport Services and Medical Countermeasures

CA AB512

State highways: relinquishment: infrastructural barriers.

VA HB1273

VA Public Procurement Act; additional public works contract requirements, delayed effective date.