California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB640

Introduced
2/15/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Report Pass
3/26/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Engrossed
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/16/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Report Pass
7/2/19  
Refer
7/2/19  
Refer
7/2/19  
Enrolled
8/15/19  
Enrolled
8/15/19  
Chaptered
8/30/19  
Passed
8/30/19  

Caption

Sex crimes: investigation and prosecution.

Impact

By amending Section 13836 of the Penal Code, AB 640 seeks to fortify the legal framework surrounding sex crime prosecutions in California. The bill stipulates a necessity for the establishment of sex crime prosecution units within district attorneys' offices, aiming for a more specialized approach in dealing with sensitive cases. The requirement for additional training on emotional trauma and specific case handling procedures is positioned to lead to more informed and compassionate responses from legal professionals when working with victims, particularly those with developmental disabilities.

Summary

Assembly Bill 640, introduced by Assemblymember Frazier, focuses on the investigation and prosecution of sex crimes, specifically enhancing the training provided to district attorneys. The bill mandates that the training established for district attorneys by the Office of Emergency Services include instruction specifically addressing cases of sexual abuse involving victims who have developmental disabilities. This added training aims to ensure that district attorneys are better equipped to handle the unique challenges and trauma that accompany such cases, thereby improving the prosecution process for these vulnerable victims.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 640 has been largely positive, with supporters advocating for stronger measures to protect vulnerable populations and improve the response rates in sexual abuse cases. Proponents view the bill as a proactive step in creating a justice system that recognizes and adequately addresses the needs of survivors, particularly those who might be overlooked or inadequately represented due to their disabilities. The absence of opposition within the voting records suggests a consensus on the importance of the bill, although specific discussions around implementation could still yield diverse opinions.

Contention

While AB 640 has garnered significant support, potential points of contention may arise during its implementation phase, particularly concerning the adequacy of resources allocated for training and the establishment of dedicated prosecution units. There may be discussions about whether existing district attorney offices have the infrastructure to effectively integrate the new training mandates without overextending their capabilities. Providing continuous education and ensuring up-to-date practices in handling sexual abuse cases remain vital to the bill's success and its intended impact on state laws and victim support.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VA SB1183

Virginia Access to Justice Act; establishes public defender office in each judicial circuit.

VA HB1865

Virginia Access to Justice Act; establishes public defender office in each judicial circuit.

CT HB06463

An Act Concerning The Department Of Correction, A Reentry Employment Advisory Committee, Public Safety Committees In Municipalities Where A Correctional Facility Is Located, The Disclosure Of Records, The Protection Of Personal Data Relating To An Employee Of The Department Of Correction And The Provision Of Debit Cards To Incarcerated Persons At The Time Of Release.

CT HB05217

An Act Concerning Revisions To Statutes Concerning The Department Of Children And Families.

CA SB823

Public health: omnibus bill.

AZ SB1316

Child fatality; maternal mortality

OR SB1159

Relating to the Children's Advocate; prescribing an effective date.

CA AB2359

Sexual Assault Crimes Against Disabled and Developmentally Disabled Victims.