California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB349

Introduced
2/19/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Report Pass
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/22/19  
Engrossed
5/22/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Refer
6/24/19  
Refer
6/24/19  
Report Pass
7/9/19  
Report Pass
7/9/19  
Refer
7/9/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Vetoed
10/13/19  

Caption

Minimum franchise tax.

Impact

The bill will significantly impact small businesses, particularly those with gross receipts under $15 million, allowing them to pay a reduced tax rate. Corporations exceeding this gross receipts threshold will continue to pay the standard minimum franchise tax. Additionally, the Franchise Tax Board is tasked with submitting annual reports on the performance of corporations affected by the tax reduction to help monitor its effectiveness and reach.

Summary

Senate Bill 349, introduced by Senator Portantino, aims to amend existing taxation laws in California to reduce the minimum franchise tax imposed on corporations and certain business entities doing business in the state. The bill proposes a reduction in the annual minimum franchise tax from $800 to an amount based on the corporation's gross receipts, specifically targeting small businesses from taxable years 2020 to 2025. This approach is intended to alleviate the financial burden on smaller corporations and encourage their growth and sustainability within the state's economy.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding SB 349 appears positive, especially among proponents of small business support and economic development. Supporters believe that reducing the tax burden will foster job creation and financial stability for small businesses. However, some concerns persist regarding the potential revenue impact for the state, as a decrease in tax income could affect funding for public services and infrastructure.

Contention

Notably, there are a few points of contention surrounding SB 349, especially regarding its implications for state revenue. While it aims to bolster small businesses, there is a fear among opponents that this could lead to a significant decline in tax income for the state. Additionally, there are considerations over fairness to larger corporations that will not benefit from the tax reduction, potentially leading to disparities in taxation treatment within the corporate sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB250

Minimum franchise tax.

CA SB1417

Minimum franchise tax.

CA SB347

Minimum franchise tax.

CA AB632

Minimum franchise tax: small business fees.

CA AB308

Taxation: corporations: minimum franchise tax: limited liability companies: annual tax.

CA AB1432

Minimum franchise tax: annual tax: businesses.

CA SB816

Taxation: corporations: minimum franchise tax: limited liability companies: annual tax: microbusinesses.

CA AB778

Taxation: corporations: minimum franchise tax: limited liability companies: annual tax: small businesses.