California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB378

Introduced
2/20/19  
Introduced
2/20/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Refer
9/6/19  
Refer
9/6/19  
Refer
1/6/20  
Refer
1/6/20  
Refer
1/6/20  
Report Pass
1/15/20  
Refer
1/15/20  
Refer
1/15/20  
Refer
1/21/20  
Refer
1/21/20  
Report Pass
1/23/20  
Report Pass
1/23/20  
Engrossed
1/27/20  
Engrossed
1/27/20  
Refer
6/18/20  
Refer
7/27/20  
Refer
7/27/20  

Caption

Probation: eligibility: crimes relating to controlled substances.

Impact

The bill is expected to significantly impact public policy in California concerning drug offenses and criminal justice reform. By making more individuals eligible for probation, the legislation could lead to lower incarceration rates for non-violent drug offenders. Advocates argue this aligns with a broader movement towards decriminalization and treating substance abuse as a public health issue rather than solely a criminal one. The expectation is that these reforms will also alleviate some overcrowding issues in the state’s prisons.

Summary

Senate Bill 378, introduced by Senator Wiener, aims to amend laws related to probation for individuals convicted of various controlled substance offenses. Currently, the law prohibits granting probation or suspending sentences for those with convictions for specific drug-related crimes, especially for repeat offenders. This bill proposes deleting certain prohibitions that currently prevent probation eligibility and allows courts to waive remaining prohibitions in the interests of justice. By expanding probation eligibility, SB378 is positioned to relieve certain offenders from harsh sentencing and reduce the burden on the criminal justice system while promoting rehabilitation over punishment.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB378 appears largely positive among proponents of criminal justice reform, who argue that the existing laws disproportionately affect marginalized groups and do not adequately address addiction issues. However, there are concerns voiced by some public safety advocates who argue that loosening restrictions on probation may undermine the seriousness of drug offenses and the safety of communities. This polarization reflects a complex debate about balancing rehabilitation and public safety.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise around the implications of granting broader probation eligibility. Critics worry that this could lead to a perceived leniency on drug-related offenses, potentially impacting the effectiveness of deterrence in combating drug abuse. Additionally, questions have been raised about the socioeconomic implications of such changes, particularly in terms of how they affect communities that have been heavily impacted by punitive drug laws in the past. Overall, SB378 marks an important step in the conversation around criminal justice and public utility regulations in California.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB73

Probation: eligibility: crimes relating to controlled substances.

CA AB607

Probation: eligibility: crimes relating to controlled substances.

CA SB1025

Probation: eligibility: crimes relating to controlled substances.

CA SB176

Controlled substances: fentanyl and carfentanil.

CA AB2405

Controlled substances: carfentanil.

CA SB22

Crimes.

CA SB1070

Controlled substances: possession of firearms.

CA AB2336

Controlled substances: armed possession: fentanyl.