California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB388

Introduced
2/20/19  
Introduced
2/20/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
2/28/19  
Refer
1/6/20  
Refer
1/6/20  
Refer
1/6/20  
Report Pass
1/14/20  
Report Pass
1/14/20  
Refer
1/14/20  
Refer
1/14/20  
Report Pass
1/23/20  
Engrossed
1/27/20  
Refer
6/18/20  
Refer
6/18/20  
Report Pass
8/6/20  
Report Pass
8/6/20  
Refer
8/6/20  
Refer
8/6/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Enrolled
8/31/20  
Enrolled
8/31/20  
Chaptered
9/28/20  
Chaptered
9/28/20  
Passed
9/28/20  

Caption

Missing persons: reports: local agencies.

Impact

The bill significantly strengthens the legal obligations of law enforcement to respond to missing persons reports, particularly for individuals under 21 or those determined to be at risk. It ensures that if a missing person is not located within 30 days, law enforcement agencies must produce a written declaration to facilitate the expedited release of necessary medical records, making it easier to further investigations into their whereabouts. This approach reflects a heightened commitment to addressing cases of missing individuals more efficiently.

Summary

Senate Bill 388, introduced by Senator Galgiani, amends Sections 14211 and 14212 of the Penal Code concerning the reporting of missing persons by local law enforcement agencies. The bill mandates that all local police and sheriff departments must accept reports of missing persons without delay and utilize a standardized form for the release of dental or skeletal X-ray records. This legislation eliminates the previous provision allowing local agencies to opt-out of these reporting requirements through a resolution, thereby standardizing the process across jurisdictions.

Sentiment

Supporters of SB 388 view it as a critical step towards ensuring the safety of vulnerable populations, particularly minors and at-risk individuals. They argue that more stringent requirements for reporting and acting on missing persons cases will improve outcomes and enhance community trust in law enforcement. Critics may express concerns about the additional burden on local departments and funding, fearing that mandates without appropriate funding could strain resources further.

Contention

There are key points of contention regarding the state's imposition of these reporting requirements on local law enforcement. While proponents argue that the protection of missing persons far outweighs bureaucratic challenges, opponents assert that local agencies may struggle to meet these new responsibilities, particularly if costs are incurred without proper state reimbursement. The bill includes provisions for state reimbursement should the Commission on State Mandates determine that the new mandates create significant financial impacts for local agencies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1262

Missing persons.

CA AB538

Sexual assault: medical evidentiary examinations and reporting.

CA AB2677

Information Practices Act of 1977.

CA AB2085

Crimes: mandated reporters.

CA SB1094

Sexual assault: medical evidentiary examinations.

CA AB1337

Information Practices Act of 1977.

CA SB823

Public health: omnibus bill.

CA AB505

The Office of Youth and Community Restoration.