California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB775

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Refer
3/14/19  
Report Pass
5/6/19  
Report Pass
5/6/19  
Refer
5/7/19  
Refer
5/7/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/28/19  
Engrossed
5/28/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Report Pass
7/9/19  

Caption

Corporation taxes: exempt organizations: mutual ditch or irrigation companies: public water system: mutual water companies.

Impact

The bill seeks to enhance compliance with state regulations and ensure transparency in operations of mutual water companies. It mandates these companies to adopt specific policies and submit annual compliance certifications to the State Water Resources Control Board. If they fail to comply, they will face a compliance fee, further incentivizing adherence. This initiative is aimed at improving oversight of public water systems, particularly in ensuring residents receive safe and accessible drinking water in compliance with state regulations.

Summary

Senate Bill 775, introduced by Senator Rubio, focuses on providing tax exemptions for mutual ditch or irrigation companies operating public water systems in California. Specifically, it exempts these companies from taxes under the Corporation Tax Law if they adhere to certain compliance requirements regarding open meetings and record accessibility. This exemption is applicable for taxable years between January 1, 2019, and January 1, 2024, allowing these companies to avoid significant tax liabilities while improving their systems with potential grant funding from state resources.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 775 appears supportive among those advocating for better management and funding practices for water services. Proponents argue that the tax exemptions will facilitate necessary upgrades to aging water infrastructures, thereby enhancing public health and safety. However, some concerns may arise regarding the potential for less oversight if companies rely solely on compliance fees without stringent enforcement of the required open meeting policies.

Contention

A key point of contention involves the balance between providing financial relief to mutual water companies and ensuring adequate public oversight. Critics may question whether these companies will prioritize compliance with open meeting regulations if the penalties involve merely paying compliance fees. Additionally, there may be debates about whether the expected improvements in public water systems will be realized without strict accountability measures in place.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2054

Corporation taxes: exempt organizations: mutual ditch or irrigation companies: public water system: mutual water companies.

CA AB2217

Income taxes: credits: Bridget “Biddy” Mason Golden State Credit Program.

CA AB279

Personal income tax: credit: food banks: donated fresh fruits and vegetables.

CA AB234

Income taxes: credit: seismic retrofits.

CA SB1178

California Water Quality and Public Health Protection Act.

CA SB789

Taxation: information returns: vacant commercial real property.

CA AB2731

Income taxes: investment management services interest: education funding.

CA AB162

High-occupancy vehicle lanes: County of Riverside.