Thermal powerplants: exemption: emergency backup and standby generators: data centers.
The legislative change establishes a new precedent for how emergency power sources are treated under California law. It modifies existing definitions in the Public Resources Code to explicitly delineate what constitutes a thermal powerplant, thereby reducing the regulatory burden on certain backups that are essential for businesses, particularly in the tech sector. This change intends to facilitate quicker and easier installations of necessary power systems while still adhering to environmental standards mandated by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). However, it does not require additional reimbursements to local governments for the costs associated with this local program.
Senate Bill 858, introduced by Senator Beall and supported by co-authors, addresses the regulatory framework for thermal powerplants in California. The bill specifically excludes emergency backup or standby generators used to maintain operations at data centers from being classified as thermal powerplants under state law. This exemption is aimed at generators not connected to the electrical grid, allowing data centers to function without interruptions during power outages. By shifting the jurisdiction for these approvals to local land use authorities, the bill simplifies the adoption of critical backup systems for data-intensive operations.
The sentiment around SB 858 appears to be generally positive among those advocating for technological advancement and business efficiency. Proponents argue that the bill aligns with modern energy needs, particularly for data centers that require uninterrupted service. Critics may express concerns over environmental implications and the potential for local control undermined by shifting jurisdiction, though such arguments seem to be less pronounced in early discussions.
While major contention points have not been heavily publicized, there is a notable tension regarding local versus state authority in land-use decisions. The flexibility granted to local governments is celebrated by some stakeholders who view it as an improvement for business operations. However, there could be apprehensions about removing regulatory oversight that state-level authority provides, especially regarding environmental impacts and ensuring that broad energy goals are met without compromising public interests.