California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB972

Introduced
2/11/20  
Introduced
2/11/20  
Refer
2/20/20  
Refer
2/20/20  
Refer
3/25/20  
Refer
3/25/20  
Refer
5/11/20  
Refer
5/11/20  
Report Pass
5/28/20  
Report Pass
5/28/20  
Refer
5/29/20  
Refer
5/29/20  
Engrossed
6/22/20  
Engrossed
6/22/20  
Refer
6/29/20  
Refer
6/29/20  
Report Pass
7/27/20  
Report Pass
7/27/20  
Refer
7/28/20  
Refer
7/28/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  

Caption

Corporation taxes: disclosure.

Impact

The implications of SB 972 are significant for corporate governance within California. By disclosing information about high-grossing corporations, the legislation is designed to illuminate corporate tax contributions, potentially affecting public perception and policy decisions regarding taxation. Lawmakers have aimed at reducing the secrecy surrounding corporate taxes to ensure fair tax compliance amongst large entities. However, this approach also raises concerns about privacy, corporate competitiveness, and potential backlash from businesses subject to public scrutiny.

Summary

Senate Bill 972, introduced by Senator Skinner, seeks to increase transparency in corporate taxation by mandating the Franchise Tax Board to compile and disclose information about corporations with substantial gross receipts. Specifically, the bill requires that, starting from April 1, 2021, and annually thereafter, a list be released that details taxpayers with gross receipts of $5 billion or more. The information must include the name of the corporation, its tax liability, the total gross receipts reported, and the types of tax credits claimed during the taxable year. This effort to enhance transparency is part of an increasing focus on corporate accountability in California's taxation system.

Sentiment

General sentiment about SB 972 appears to lean towards support among advocates of tax transparency and fairness, who argue that the public has a right to know how much tax corporations are contributing relative to their profits. Nonetheless, there are dissenting views, mainly from business groups and some legislators, who worry that increased disclosure could unfairly target corporations and lead to reputational damage. The debate underscores a broader conversation about the balance between fiscal transparency and business privacy in California's economic landscape.

Contention

One of the key points of contention surrounding SB 972 includes discussions about the implications of mandatory disclosure for businesses, particularly regarding how it may deter investment or lead to nuanced tax planning strategies to mitigate visibility. Critics worry that public access to sensitive tax data could lead to misinterpretation of businesses’ tax contributions, while supporters counter that transparency is crucial for holding corporations accountable. The tension reflects ongoing challenges in reforming tax legislation while addressing the interests of diverse stakeholders in the economy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3264

Energy: cost framework: residential rates: demand-side management programs report: electrical transmission grid study.

CA AB2197

Personal income taxes: Protect Our Coast and Oceans Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

CA AB492

Property tax assistance: eligibility.

CA AB2217

Income taxes: credits: Bridget “Biddy” Mason Golden State Credit Program.

CA AB2616

Personal income tax: mortgage interest deduction.

CA AB279

Personal income tax: credit: food banks: donated fresh fruits and vegetables.

CA AB2068

Voluntary tax contributions: California Firefighters’ Memorial Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund: California Peace Officer Memorial Foundation Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

CA SB587

California Sea Otter Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.