California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1856

Introduced
2/8/22  
Introduced
2/8/22  
Refer
2/18/22  
Refer
2/18/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Refer
5/27/22  
Refer
5/27/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Refer
8/2/22  
Refer
8/2/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Enrolled
8/31/22  
Vetoed
9/25/22  

Caption

Community colleges: part-time employees.

Impact

Upon its enactment, AB 1856 will significantly impact part-time faculty across community colleges in California by redefining employment classifications and reemployment negotiations. Community colleges will now be required to negotiate agreements that include provisions for reemployment preferences based on minimum standards up to 85% of a full-time load. This adjustment aligns with the funding requirements from the State Equity and Achievement Program, representing a shift in legislative support towards part-time educators, and thereby adjusting existing employment landscapes in community colleges.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1856, introduced by Assembly Member Medina, aims to amend certain provisions within the California Education Code regarding the employment of part-time and temporary faculty in community colleges. The bill changes the conditions under which community colleges must negotiate the terms of reemployment preferences for part-time temporary faculty, specifically increasing the threshold of hours they may teach from 67% to 85% of a full-time load without being categorized as contract employees. This change is seen as beneficial for part-time faculty, potentially affording them more job stability and clearer paths to reemployment.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1856 appears largely supportive among those advocating for the rights of part-time faculty. Supporters argue that the bill enhances job security and acknowledges the contributions of temporary faculty within the community college system. However, there may be concerns within some administrative circles regarding the potential implications for budgetary constraints and operational flexibility, as increased job security measures could affect the hiring practices and budgets of community college districts.

Contention

Despite its supportive intent, the bill has engendered some contention, particularly concerning the financial implications for community colleges. While advocates highlight improved conditions for part-time faculty, critics express logistical worries regarding the feasibility of implementing the new standards in a fiscally responsible manner. Additionally, there are apprehensions about how this shift might complicate the already complex landscape of employment and administrative processes within the community college systems, calling for careful consideration as institutions adjust to these legislative changes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB375

Community colleges: part-time employees.

CA AB897

Community colleges: part-time employees.

CA AB2277

Community colleges: part-time faculty.

CA AB260

Community colleges: part-time employees.

CA AB1752

Community colleges: part-time employees.

CA AB1190

Community colleges: part-time faculty: office hours.

CA AB2160

Classified employees: school and community college districts: part-time playground positions.

KY SB25

AN ACT relating to actions in response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and declaring an emergency.