California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2043

Introduced
2/14/22  
Introduced
2/14/22  
Refer
3/31/22  
Refer
3/31/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Report Pass
4/18/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Refer
4/19/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Engrossed
5/26/22  
Refer
5/27/22  
Refer
5/27/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Refer
6/13/22  
Refer
6/13/22  
Report Pass
6/23/22  
Refer
6/23/22  
Report Pass
6/29/22  
Refer
6/30/22  
Refer
6/30/22  
Refer
8/2/22  
Refer
8/2/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/25/22  
Enrolled
8/25/22  
Chaptered
9/29/22  
Chaptered
9/29/22  
Passed
9/29/22  

Caption

Bail bonds.

Impact

The law will significantly impact the landscape of bail recovery in California. By requiring licensing, it raises the standards expected of those tasked with apprehending fugitives. Additionally, bail fugitive recovery agents will now be required to carry at least $1,000,000 in liability insurance and obtain a surety bond of the same amount. These stipulations are expected to enhance consumer protection and accountability among agents. The introduction of an educational requirement, including a 40-hour power of arrest course, will better prepare agents for their duties and potentially mitigate risks associated with bounty hunting.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2043 focuses on the regulation of bail fugitive recovery agents in California. It alters the existing framework under the Bail Fugitive Recovery Persons Act by introducing licensing requirements specifically for bail fugitive recovery agents. As of July 1, 2023, it will be mandatory for individuals engaging in the activities of arresting bail fugitives to obtain proper licensure. This aims to increase accountability and professional standards within the bail recovery industry by prohibiting unlicensed individuals from performing these activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2043 appears to be mixed but is largely supportive among those advocating for regulatory oversight and professionalism in the field of bail recovery. Proponents argue that these regulations are necessary to prevent abuses and improve standards, while some critics express concerns about the additional costs and regulatory burdens placed on bail agents. Overall, the discussions indicate a recognition of the need for reform but also highlight concerns about its potential implications for existing bail practices.

Contention

One notable point of contention regarding AB 2043 is the potential for raised costs associated with the new requirements. Bail agents may face higher application fees and the financial burden of obtaining liability insurance, which some argue could deter individuals from entering the profession. Furthermore, the bill's restrictions on who can apprehend fugitives may lead to a monopoly on bail recovery activities by licensed individuals, raising concerns about competition and access within the industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB779

Bail: surety insurers.

CA AB743

California Financing Law: lawsuit financiers.

CA SB473

California Endangered Species Act.

CA SB898

Bail: surety insurers.

CA SB1242

Insurance.

LA HB562

Provides relative to proprietary schools (EN SEE FISC NOTE SG RV See Note)

CA AB1284

California Financing Law: Property Assessed Clean Energy program: program administrators.