California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2048

Introduced
2/14/22  
Introduced
2/14/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Engrossed
5/5/22  
Engrossed
5/5/22  
Refer
5/5/22  
Refer
5/5/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Refer
5/18/22  
Report Pass
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/8/22  
Refer
6/9/22  
Refer
6/9/22  
Enrolled
8/22/22  
Enrolled
8/22/22  
Chaptered
9/22/22  
Chaptered
9/22/22  
Passed
9/22/22  

Caption

Solid waste: franchise agreements: database.

Impact

The legislation modifies existing regulations under the California Integrated Waste Management Act by placing additional obligations on local government entities regarding solid waste management. By requiring the publication of franchise agreements, the bill encourages local agencies to be more transparent about their partnerships with private hauling companies. According to the bill, jurisdictions have the authority to establish how these services are delivered, but now must also follow the new protocols for public disclosure.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2048, introduced by Assemblymember Santiago, seeks to enhance transparency in the management of solid waste within California. The bill mandates that local jurisdictions and public agencies must publish current franchise agreements with solid waste and recycling haulers on their websites. This requirement is intended to create a publicly accessible database through the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, which aims to provide direct links to these agreements, thereby promoting accountability and informed public engagement.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 2048 appears to be positive, with supporters emphasizing the importance of transparency in local government operations concerning solid waste management. Environmental advocates and proponents of local accountability likely view this as a step toward enhanced public awareness and oversight. However, there may be some concern regarding the administrative burden this legislation places on smaller jurisdictions, which may not have the necessary resources to comply with the new requirements efficiently.

Contention

While the bill is largely supportive of transparency, it does generate a minor contention regarding the lack of state reimbursement for the additional costs incurred by local agencies in implementing these new requirements. The bill specifies that no reimbursement is needed as local agencies can cover these costs via service charges or fees, which has prompted some discussion about the potential impact on smaller jurisdictions and their capacity to manage the requirements effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB71

Solid waste: disposal.

CA AB1826

Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2024.

CA AB41

Telecommunications: The Digital Equity in Video Franchising Act of 2023.

CA SB751

Franchise agreements: solid waste handling services: labor dispute.

CA SB28

Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2006: deployment data.