California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2150

Introduced
2/15/22  
Introduced
2/15/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Refer
4/26/22  
Refer
5/11/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Report Pass
6/15/22  
Report Pass
6/15/22  

Caption

Cannabis research.

Impact

If the Regents of the University of California accept their responsibility, AB 2150 will mandate that the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research conduct a comprehensive study on cannabis products available in the commercial market. This study will evaluate the implications of driving under the influence of cannabis and refine methods for detecting impairment. The bill appropriates $2 million from the California Cannabis Tax Fund to facilitate this research, marking a significant step toward understanding public health and safety issues related to legal cannabis use.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2150, introduced by Assembly Members Lackey and Cooley, aims to enhance the understanding of cannabis products and their impact on public safety by establishing a research study under the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research. The bill responds to the growing market of cannabis products with varying tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrations, many of which exceed traditional federal research thresholds. It recognizes the need for research on the medical efficacy and safety of cannabis and addresses the current lack of knowledge regarding the effects of high-THC products on drivers and public safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2150 appears largely supportive among advocates for cannabis research, as it acknowledges the need for systematic study in a rapidly evolving field. Stakeholders, including legislators and public health officials, see the bill as a vital measure for enhancing safety standards related to cannabis usage on the road. Concerns may arise, however, regarding the potential implications of increased cannabis usage, particularly as it pertains to public health and law enforcement's role in managing impaired driving incidents.

Contention

Discussions around AB 2150 may involve contention related to the extent of cannabis use monitoring and its potential impact on civil liberties. While proponents emphasize the need for rigorous scientific data to inform public safety policies, detractors may worry about the implications for privacy and the enforcement of cannabis laws. The collaborative role of law enforcement agencies, like the California Highway Patrol in conducting research, may also stir debate over the appropriate balance between safety and individual rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1616

California Cannabis Tax Fund: Board of State and Community Corrections grants.

CA AB1565

California Cannabis Tax Fund: local equity program grants.

CA AB2643

Cannabis cultivation: environmental remediation.

CA AB687

California Cannabis Authority.

CA SB540

Cannabis and cannabis products: health warnings.

CA AB1207

Cannabis: labeling and advertising.

CA AB1610

Cannabis: Department of Cannabis Control.

CA SB512

Cannabis: taxation: gross receipts.

CA AB420

Cannabis: industrial hemp.

CA AB623

Cannabis: THC testing variances.

Similar Bills

CA AB2925

California Cannabis Tax Fund: spending reports.

CA AB1616

California Cannabis Tax Fund: Board of State and Community Corrections grants.

CA AB141

California Cannabis Tax Fund: Department of Cannabis Control: Board of State and Community Corrections grants.

CA SB141

California Cannabis Tax Fund: Department of Cannabis Control: Board of State and Community Corrections grants.

CA AB1565

California Cannabis Tax Fund: local equity program grants.

CA AB903

California Marijuana Tax Fund: California Highway Patrol.

CA AB1002

Center for Cannabis Research.

CA AB1996

The California Cannabis Research Program.