California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1616

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Refer
4/26/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Report Pass
6/26/23  
Report Pass
6/26/23  
Refer
6/26/23  

Caption

California Cannabis Tax Fund: Board of State and Community Corrections grants.

Impact

The introduction of AB 1616 represents a significant shift in how grant funding is distributed from the California Cannabis Tax Fund, which was established to support public safety and health initiatives associated with cannabis legalization. The bill mandates that the Board prioritize funding for local programs focused on curbing illegal cannabis activities, thereby aligning with the intent of the Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA). The expected outcome is a decrease in illicit cannabis sales and cultivation, presuming effective implementation of the provided funds.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1616, introduced by Assembly Member Lackey, proposes amendments to Section 34019 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, focusing on the California Cannabis Tax Fund and the distribution of grant funding by the Board of State and Community Corrections. This bill aims to prioritize local governments with programs targeting unlawful cannabis cultivation and sales, thereby reinforcing the state’s efforts to combat illegal cannabis activities while providing financial resources to support this initiative. By allowing grants to local governments that may prohibit cannabis cultivation or retail sale, the bill creates a mechanism for cities to address local cannabis-related challenges directly.

Contention

However, AB 1616 may elicit contention among local governments that wish to maintain their regulatory autonomy. By permitting grants to municipalities that impose strict regulations or bans on cannabis, the bill could be viewed as undermining the spirit of AUMA, which was designed to promote a regulated cannabis market. Critics may argue that this approach could hamper the legitimate cannabis businesses and exacerbate disparities in access to cannabis products across different regions, particularly in areas that have opted for stricter regulatory measures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2925

California Cannabis Tax Fund: spending reports.

CA AB2150

Cannabis research.

CA AB903

California Marijuana Tax Fund: California Highway Patrol.

CA AB1565

California Cannabis Tax Fund: local equity program grants.

CA AB1002

Center for Cannabis Research.

CA AB1996

The California Cannabis Research Program.

CA SB827

Cannabis.

CA AB1872

Cannabis.