California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2156

Introduced
2/15/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Report Pass
3/23/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/29/22  
Refer
3/29/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
5/26/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Refer
6/1/22  
Report Pass
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/8/22  
Refer
6/8/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Report Pass
6/13/22  
Enrolled
6/29/22  
Enrolled
6/29/22  
Chaptered
7/21/22  
Passed
7/21/22  

Caption

Firearms: manufacturers.

Impact

The enactment of AB 2156 imposes significant changes to the current regulatory landscape for firearm manufacturers in California. By demanding state licensure for those manufacturing a mere four firearms annually, the bill aims to enhance oversight and accountability in the firearms industry. Additionally, it explicitly prohibits the production of firearms or precursor parts through 3D printing unless appropriately licensed, thereby addressing concerns related to unregulated firearm production via digital manufacturing methods.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2156, introduced by Assemblymember Wicks, amends Section 29010 of the Penal Code concerning firearms manufacturing in California. The bill requires all individuals or entities wishing to manufacture firearms to obtain a state license, irrespective of their federal licensing status. This law notably lowers the threshold for state licensing from producing 50 firearms in a year to just 4, making it more stringent and encompassing a broader range of firearm manufacturers, including those employing advanced manufacturing techniques such as 3D printing.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding AB 2156 has been mixed. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step towards enhancing public safety and regulating firearm manufacturing more strictly, helping to prevent unlicensed and potentially dangerous gun production. However, critics have voiced concerns regarding the implications for small manufacturers and hobbyists who may get caught in the broader licensing requirements, potentially leading to administrative burdens and reduced accessibility for responsible firearm craftsmanship.

Contention

The primary contention surrounding AB 2156 stems from the delicate balance it seeks between public safety and individual rights. Advocates of stricter firearm regulations promote the bill as a critical measure to mitigate gun violence and ensure responsible manufacturing practices. In contrast, opponents express fears that the stringent regulations may hinder individual liberties and stifle innovation in firearms manufacturing, particularly for smaller entities and individual craftsmen who may struggle with the new licensing complexities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1089

Firearms.

CA AB1263

Firearms: ghost guns.

CA AB1127

Firearms: converter pistols.

CA AB3064

Firearms.

MI SB1149

Weapons: firearms; requirement for all firearm components to contain serial numbers; provide for. Amends 1927 PA 372 (MCL 28.421 - 28.435) by adding sec. 14c.

MI HB6184

Civil procedure: other; firearm industry responsibility act; provide for. Amends 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.101 - 600.9947) by adding sec. 3845. TIE BAR WITH: HB 6185'24

NJ A907

Upgrades certain crimes related to manufacturing firearms from second to first degree.

MS HB850

Unserialized firearms ("ghost guns"); create crime of possession of.