California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2224

Introduced
2/15/22  
Introduced
2/15/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Refer
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Report Pass
3/24/22  
Refer
3/28/22  
Report Pass
4/26/22  
Engrossed
5/9/22  
Refer
5/10/22  

Caption

Real estate: transactions: iBuyers.

Impact

The introduction of AB 2224 is poised to influence real estate transaction practices by ensuring that local agents are involved, potentially improving local market conditions and fostering relationships between real estate professionals and technology-driven platforms. This change could alter how transactions are conducted, emphasizing the importance of local knowledge and engagement in the selling process. The bill reflects an adaptation to new trends in real estate driven by technology, while also attempting to maintain the integrity of local practices.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2224, introduced by Assembly Member McCarty, seeks to regulate the activities of iBuyers—online real estate platforms that utilize technology to buy and sell properties. The bill mandates that iBuyers must collaborate with local real estate agents when selling properties situated in California. However, this requirement does not extend to the initial sale of new construction properties, providing a significant exemption within the legislative framework. By enforcing this collaboration, the bill aims to enhance local real estate practices and improve the interaction between online services and local markets.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2224 appeared to be supportive among local real estate agents, who see the bill as a protective measure that ensures their relevance in a rapidly changing landscape dominated by technology. However, there may be concerns from iBuyer companies regarding the increased operational requirements and possible limitations on their business model. The discussions suggest a complicated balance between embracing technological innovation and preserving local expertise in property transactions.

Contention

Some contention arises regarding the necessity and implications of requiring iBuyers to partner with local agents. Critics may argue that this requirement could stifle innovation and convenience for consumers seeking to utilize these digital platforms. Proponents of the bill advocate for the necessity of local agents' insights and expertise that they believe enhance the sale process, highlighting the potential risks of minimizing local input in real estate transactions—a delicate balance that the bill attempts to navigate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB499

Residential projects: fees and charges: emergency services.

CA SB896

Wildfires: defensible space: grant programs: local governments.

CA SB662

Wildfires: defensible space: education efforts.

CA AB1457

Wildfires: training: defensible space: inspections.

CA AB2777

State employees: travel reimbursements.

CA SB514

Wildfire prevention: assessment: accreditation.

CA SB644

Hotel and private residence rental reservations: cancellation: refunds.

CA SB1049

Cities and counties: ordinances: short-term rentals.