California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB7

Introduced
12/7/20  
Introduced
12/7/20  
Refer
1/11/21  
Refer
1/11/21  
Report Pass
4/13/21  
Report Pass
4/13/21  
Refer
4/14/21  
Refer
4/14/21  
Report Pass
4/26/21  
Report Pass
4/26/21  
Refer
4/26/21  
Refer
4/26/21  
Refer
5/12/21  
Refer
5/12/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Engrossed
5/27/21  
Engrossed
5/27/21  
Refer
5/28/21  
Refer
5/28/21  
Refer
6/9/21  
Refer
6/9/21  
Report Pass
6/23/21  
Refer
6/23/21  
Refer
6/23/21  
Report Pass
6/29/21  
Report Pass
6/29/21  
Refer
6/29/21  
Refer
7/15/21  
Refer
7/15/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  
Enrolled
9/7/21  
Enrolled
9/7/21  
Vetoed
10/4/21  

Caption

Emergency ambulance employees: multithreat body protective gear.

Impact

The bill adds a new requirement for emergency ambulance providers under the California Labor Code, thereby increasing safety standards for personnel who often face dangerous situations. By requiring the provision of specific protective gear and accompanying training, the legislation seeks to mitigate risks associated with emergency medical service work. Additionally, it directs the Emergency Medical Services Authority to develop standards and certification processes for this protective gear, introducing a structured approach to equipment safety.

Summary

Assembly Bill 7, introduced by Assembly Member Rodriguez and co-authored by several other Assembly Members, aims to enhance safety for emergency ambulance employees by mandating the provision of multithreat body protective gear. This gear is defined as equipment that is bullet, strike, slash, and stab resistant, designed to protect emergency responders during their duties. The bill stipulates that upon request, ambulance providers must make this protective gear available and provide training on its proper usage. Furthermore, emergency ambulance employees must be informed of their right to request such gear during their initial employment and annually thereafter.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding AB 7 have generally been supportive, with advocates pointing out the necessity of such protections for workers who can be exposed to violence or hazardous conditions. Supporters argue that this bill not only safeguards the health and safety of emergency personnel but also addresses a growing concern for workplace violence in the healthcare field. However, there may be some contention regarding the potential costs for ambulance providers and the implications on operations, but these concerns seem outweighed by the safety benefits.

Contention

Notable points of contention may revolve around the implementation and financial burden this bill places on emergency ambulance providers, particularly smaller organizations that may struggle with the added costs of purchasing protective gear and training employees. Nonetheless, the overarching goal of enhancing the safety of emergency responders has drawn considerable support, especially in light of increased rates of violence against such workers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2092

Emergency ambulance employees: subsidized protective gear.

CA AB1998

Dental Practice Act: unprofessional conduct.

CA AB931

Sentencing: dismissal of enhancements.

CA SB697

Physician assistants: practice agreement: supervision.

CA AB1650

Emergency medical services: community paramedicine.

CA AB3241

Law enforcement: police canines.

CA AB841

Energy: transportation electrification: energy efficiency programs: School Energy Efficiency Stimulus Program.

CA SB944

Community Paramedicine Act of 2018.