California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB773

Introduced
2/16/21  
Introduced
2/16/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Report Pass
5/6/21  
Engrossed
5/13/21  
Engrossed
5/13/21  
Refer
5/13/21  
Refer
5/27/21  
Refer
5/27/21  
Report Pass
7/5/21  
Refer
7/5/21  
Report Pass
7/13/21  
Enrolled
8/30/21  
Enrolled
8/30/21  
Chaptered
10/6/21  
Chaptered
10/6/21  
Passed
10/6/21  

Caption

Street closures and designations.

Impact

The legislation is expected to have significant implications for local traffic management. It facilitates a structured approach to traffic restriction, which could lead to safer and more accessible public spaces in urban settings. Local authorities are given the discretion to determine when and how street closures should occur, but they must adhere to specific criteria, including community feedback and ensuring sufficient access for other forms of traffic. This balance aims to improve local quality of life while addressing safety concerns related to traffic volume and pedestrian access.

Summary

AB 773, introduced by Assemblymember Nazarian, aims to empower local authorities in California to adopt a 'slow streets' program as part of their traffic management strategy. The bill amends Section 21101 of the Vehicle Code, permitting the implementation of street closures or traffic restrictions in neighborhood streets to enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists. The primary focus is on enhancing community access to urban areas, bicycle networks, and green spaces, ensuring that these changes are made with the involvement and approval of the local community.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 773 appears largely positive, reflecting a growing trend in urban planning towards pedestrian-friendly environments. Supporters praise the initiative for promoting a healthier lifestyle by encouraging walking and biking. There is a recognition of the importance of community involvement in local decision-making processes, which is a significant aspect of the bill. However, there may be concerns from some residents about potential inconveniences caused by street closures and a shift in traffic patterns.

Contention

Despite its advantages, AB 773 may face contention over the specific implementation of the slow streets program. Opponents may argue that closing streets could disrupt traffic flow and accessibility for vehicle users. The legislation requires local governments to conduct an outreach process, ensuring that community concerns are addressed. Nevertheless, balancing various community needs while improving safety and access can be challenging and might lead to debates regarding the adequacy of community engagement efforts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB1548

Relating to the operation of golf carts, neighborhood electric vehicles, and off-highway vehicles; authorizing fees.

CT HB05170

An Act Streamlining Traffic Safety Evaluations.

AZ SB1019

Photo enforcement systems; prohibition

AZ SCR1002

Photo enforcement systems; prohibition

AZ SCR1001

Photo radar prohibition

AZ SB1003

Prohibition; photo radar

AZ SB1134

Prohibition; photo radar.

AZ SB1234

Prohibition; photo radar