California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB783

Introduced
2/16/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Report Pass
4/26/21  
Report Pass
4/26/21  
Refer
4/26/21  
Refer
4/26/21  
Refer
5/5/21  
Refer
5/5/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Engrossed
6/1/21  
Refer
6/2/21  
Refer
6/2/21  
Refer
6/9/21  
Refer
6/9/21  
Report Pass
6/29/21  
Report Pass
6/29/21  
Refer
6/29/21  
Refer
6/29/21  
Report Pass
7/15/21  
Report Pass
7/15/21  
Enrolled
8/26/21  
Vetoed
10/8/21  

Caption

Surface mines: safety regulation.

Impact

This legislative proposal modifies how enforcement actions are handled in the surface mining industry. Specifically, it mandates that after inspections, employers must receive a 'Notice of Hazard' within 72 hours if there are any visible conditions that could lead to injuries if not addressed promptly. This is designed to increase the accountability of mine operators concerning observable risks, thereby enhancing the safety of workers in these environments. The language of the bill also protects the enforcement process by ensuring that the lack of detail in official notices does not preclude necessary enforcement actions, which could otherwise diminish the safety oversight provided by DOSH.

Summary

Assembly Bill 783, introduced by Assembly Member Gray, focuses on enhancing safety regulations specifically for surface mines within California. It aims to clarify and streamline the process of issuing citations and notices regarding safety violations. Under existing law, the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) has set timelines and conditions around the enforcement of safety standards in mining operations. This bill stipulates that DOSH cannot issue citations or notices for violations that occurred more than six months prior, emphasizing timely compliance and communication of safety issues to mine employers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 783 appears to lean towards support among lawmakers focused on occupational safety and health. Proponents argue that the bill reflects a necessary advancement in the regulatory framework overseeing surface mines, ultimately fostering a safer working environment. However, potential concerns could arise about the implications of limiting the liability of surface mine operators in cases of delayed citations, which might lead some critics to suggest that the bill could inadvertently reduce the standard of care required for mining safety. This tension indicates a need for balancing regulatory efficiency with robust safety compliance.

Contention

Notable points of contention could include the six-month limitation on issuing citations and how this might affect timely enforcement. Critics may argue that this could allow for delays that could ultimately endanger worker safety, as hazardous conditions might persist longer without the possibility of immediate corrective action. Additionally, there might be discussions regarding how effectively the proposed notice system will operate in real-world contexts of varied mining operations. The overall implications for accountability in surface mining safety regulation and potential impacts on worker protection will be significant considerations as this bill progresses through the legislative process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ HB2440

Electric energy; power companies; priorities

CA SB256

Electricity: electrical infrastructure: wildfire mitigation.

CA AB825

Energy: electricity.

CA SB70

Electricity: undergrounding of electrical infrastructure.

CA AB537

Communications: wireless telecommunications and broadband facilities.

CA SB1493

Public resources.

CA SB1003

Electricity: wildfire mitigation.

CA AB2889

Wildfire mitigation plans: electrical infrastructure: hardening.