The amendment proposed by AB 855 impacts the legal recognition of certain state holidays within the judicial context. By eliminating Native American Day as a judicial holiday, the bill reflects a shift in how the state acknowledges different cultural holidays within its legal system. The inclusion of Columbus Day as a judicial holiday raises questions about historical representation and the meanings associated with these holidays. The amendments would require courts to adapt their holiday schedules and could influence public perception of these holidays within California's legal framework.
Assembly Bill 855, introduced by Assemblymember Ramos, aims to amend Section 135 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding holidays recognized in the judicial system of California. The bill specifically seeks to remove Native American Day, celebrated on the 4th Friday in September, from the list of judicial holidays while adding Columbus Day, the 2nd Monday in October, to this category. The intent behind this legislative change is to redefine the holidays recognized by California courts in line with broader state holiday designations.
The sentiment surrounding AB 855 is mixed. Proponents of the bill may view it as a necessary adjustment to the judicial holiday calendar that aligns with the state's broader holiday recognition practices. Conversely, opponents could argue that the removal of Native American Day signifies a neglect of indigenous communities and their historical significance. Discussion among legislators points to underlying tensions regarding historical narratives and cultural sensitivity around state holidays.
The main points of contention focus on the implications of replacing Native American Day with Columbus Day. Opponents argue that this change disregards the significance of Native American Day in honoring Indigenous peoples and their contributions to California's history. Additionally, the decision to elevate Columbus Day—often associated with contentious historical events—over a holiday dedicated to Native Americans highlights the ongoing debate about representation and respect for cultural diversity in state-sanctioned dates. This legislative decision may prompt broader discussions about how holidays are chosen and recognized at the state level.