| 1 | | - | Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 177 CHAPTER 175Relative to the Christopher Columbus Transcontinental Highway. [ Filed with Secretary of State September 13, 2022. ] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 177, Bloom. Christopher Columbus Transcontinental Highway: removal of designation. This measure would request that the Department of Transportation remove the The Christopher Columbus Transcontinental Highway designation from the portion of Interstate 10 in the state, as well as any signage and markers memorializing that designation, and advise the Federal Highway Administration of the states action.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES Bill TextWHEREAS, Interstate 10 in California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida is a transcontinental route of almost 3,000 miles, traveled by millions of Americans throughout the year; and WHEREAS, In 1976, the Legislature designated the portion of Interstate 10 in California as The Christopher Columbus Transcontinental Highway as a way to celebrate him as a distinguished pioneer, revered by millions for his exploits; and WHEREAS, Today, it is widely and accurately accepted that Christopher Columbus did not discover America; and WHEREAS, Christopher Columbus provided the impetus for European colonization of North America; andWHEREAS, That colonization and conquest led directly to the confiscation of land from indigenous people, displacement, and enslavement; andWHEREAS, Millions of indigenous people suffered violent death from the conquest, disease, and forced slave labor; andWHEREAS, Proper and appropriate restitution and contrition have not been memorialized, documented, or enacted; andWHEREAS, The state has a responsibility to promote and enhance safety for all residents and uplift truth, dignity, and justice for all; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature request the Department of Transportation to remove the The Christopher Columbus Transcontinental Highway designation from the portion of Interstate 10 in California, as well as any signage and markers memorializing that designation, and advise the Federal Highway Administration of the states action; and be it furtherResolved, That this effectively overturns and reverses ACR 106 (Resolution Chapter 71 of the Statutes of 1976); and be it furtherResolved, That if there are any efforts to replace the removed signage, these efforts should involve public input and feedback, including input and participation from the City of Los Angeles, the County of Los Angeles, and the Los Angeles City/County Native American Indian Commission; and be it further Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the legislatures of the other states that Interstate 10 passes through with a request that they take similar action; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly also transmit copies of this resolution to the Director of Transportation and to the Executive Director of the Federal Highway Administration. |
|---|
| 1 | + | Enrolled September 02, 2022 Passed IN Senate August 31, 2022 Passed IN Assembly August 31, 2022 Amended IN Senate August 25, 2022 Amended IN Assembly May 23, 2022 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 177Introduced by Assembly Members Bloom and Ramos(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Alvarez, Arambula, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner Horvath, Mia Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Choi, Cooper, Megan Dahle, Daly, Davies, Flora, Mike Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Haney, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Lee, Levine, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, McCarty, McKinnor, Medina, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, ODonnell, Petrie-Norris, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Santiago, Smith, Stone, Ting, Valladares, Villapudua, Waldron, Ward, Akilah Weber, Wicks, Wilson, and Wood)April 18, 2022Relative to the Christopher Columbus Transcontinental Highway. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 177, Bloom. Christopher Columbus Transcontinental Highway: removal of designation. This measure would request that the Department of Transportation remove the The Christopher Columbus Transcontinental Highway designation from the portion of Interstate 10 in the state, as well as any signage and markers memorializing that designation, and advise the Federal Highway Administration of the states action.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES Bill TextWHEREAS, Interstate 10 in California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida is a transcontinental route of almost 3,000 miles, traveled by millions of Americans throughout the year; and WHEREAS, In 1976, the Legislature designated the portion of Interstate 10 in California as The Christopher Columbus Transcontinental Highway as a way to celebrate him as a distinguished pioneer, revered by millions for his exploits; and WHEREAS, Today, it is widely and accurately accepted that Christopher Columbus did not discover America; and WHEREAS, Christopher Columbus provided the impetus for European colonization of North America; andWHEREAS, That colonization and conquest led directly to the confiscation of land from indigenous people, displacement, and enslavement; andWHEREAS, Millions of indigenous people suffered violent death from the conquest, disease, and forced slave labor; andWHEREAS, Proper and appropriate restitution and contrition have not been memorialized, documented, or enacted; andWHEREAS, The state has a responsibility to promote and enhance safety for all residents and uplift truth, dignity, and justice for all; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature request the Department of Transportation to remove the The Christopher Columbus Transcontinental Highway designation from the portion of Interstate 10 in California, as well as any signage and markers memorializing that designation, and advise the Federal Highway Administration of the states action; and be it furtherResolved, That this effectively overturns and reverses ACR 106 (Resolution Chapter 71 of the Statutes of 1976); and be it furtherResolved, That if there are any efforts to replace the removed signage, these efforts should involve public input and feedback, including input and participation from the City of Los Angeles, the County of Los Angeles, and the Los Angeles City/County Native American Indian Commission; and be it further Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the legislatures of the other states that Interstate 10 passes through with a request that they take similar action; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly also transmit copies of this resolution to the Director of Transportation and to the Executive Director of the Federal Highway Administration. |
|---|