California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1168

Introduced
2/17/22  
Refer
3/2/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Engrossed
5/9/22  
Refer
5/12/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Report Pass
8/3/22  
Enrolled
8/11/22  
Chaptered
8/26/22  

Caption

Public employees’ retirement: beneficiary payment.

Impact

The modification in benefit amounts significantly impacts the overall provisions of the Public Employees Retirement Law (PERL) and enhances the financial security for families of deceased retirees. By increasing the payment to $2,000, the bill reflects an acknowledgment of the rising costs associated with funerals and other related expenses. The legislation is expected to provide greater peace of mind to public employees as they plan for their retirement, knowing that their beneficiaries will receive a more substantial financial cushion in the event of their passing after retirement.

Summary

Senate Bill 1168, introduced by Senator Cortese, amends Section 21620 of the Government Code related to public retirement. The bill specifically addresses the benefits granted to beneficiaries of retired public employees receiving a retirement allowance under the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). The legislation aims to increase the benefit amount payable upon the death of a retiree from $500 to $2,000, effective for deaths occurring on or after July 1, 2023. This change is designed to enhance the financial support provided to beneficiaries, recognizing the importance of such payments in managing the economic challenges that arise after the loss of a family member.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1168 has largely been positive, with support from various stakeholders who view the increase as a necessary adjustment to reflect current economic realities. Stakeholders, including public employee unions and advocates for retirees, have highlighted the importance of ensuring that beneficiaries receive adequate support after a retiree's death. However, there were concerns regarding the financial implications for the state or contracting agencies that are responsible for funding these increased benefits, indicating a cautious optimism for the bill's implementation.

Contention

While no significant opposition was noted during the discussions around SB 1168, it primarily revolves around issues of funding and budgetary constraints for the state and local agency budgets. Ensuring that sufficient resources are allocated to cover the increased beneficiary payments might present a challenge, particularly in times of fiscal restraint. As such, the ongoing debate centers on the balance between providing enhanced benefits to public employees' beneficiaries and the sustainability of the retirement system in light of expanded financial obligations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2724

Medi-Cal: alternate health care service plan.

CA SB1166

Public Employees’ Retirement System: contracting agency: contributions.

CA SB740

Insurance: unclaimed life insurance.

CA AB1230

Medi-Cal and Medicare: dual eligible beneficiaries: special needs plans.

MI SB1001

Higher education: financial aid; Michigan education trust act; modify. Amends secs. 4 & 8 of 1986 PA 316 (MCL 390.1424 & 390.1428).

MI HB5782

Higher education: financial aid; Michigan education trust act; modify. Amends secs. 4 & 8 of 1986 PA 316 (MCL 390.1424 & 390.1428).

CT SB01020

An Act Concerning Funeral Service Contracts.

CA AB2100

Medi-Cal: pharmacy benefits.