California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB466

Introduced
2/16/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
3/10/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Refer
4/29/21  
Refer
4/29/21  
Report Pass
5/10/21  
Engrossed
5/17/21  
Engrossed
5/17/21  
Refer
5/28/21  
Refer
5/28/21  
Refer
6/14/21  

Caption

Community development.

Impact

The enactment of SB 466 allows the City of Santa Clara to bypass some of the typical procedures required under existing laws for property disposal, enabling a streamlined process for facilitating economic development. This change provides flexibility for local governments in managing and leveraging land for community benefit but also underscores the need for transparency and public engagement through hearings and reports detailing the sale's financial and developmental context.

Summary

Senate Bill 466, introduced by Senator Wieckowski, authorizes the City of Santa Clara to sell or lease property located at 500 Benton Street to create an economic opportunity. This bill specifies that the property disposal must be approved through a resolution by the city's legislative body, following a public hearing that requires advance notice to the community. The bill mandates that the city make available for public review a report detailing the proposed sale or lease along with a summary of its economic implications.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 466 appears to be supportive among proponents who see the bill as a necessary tool for fostering economic activity and enhancing the city's capacity to develop land efficiently. However, there may be concerns from community members or activists regarding ensuring adequate public participation in the decision-making process and protecting environmental standards before such sales or leases proceed.

Contention

A notable point of contention related to the bill is the balance it strikes between streamlining local government actions for economic development and maintaining rigorous environmental standards and public accountability. While the bill seems to promote economic growth, critics may argue it could lead to insufficient scrutiny of how such properties are utilized and the long-term implications on local communities and environments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB828

Land use: economic development: surplus land.

CA SB747

Land use: surplus land.

CA AB2534

Public resources: environmental education: grant program: Hollister Ranch.

CA SB51

Surplus residential property.

CA AB721

Huron Hawk Conservancy.

CA AB389

Native American repatriation: California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 2001: California State University.

CA AB1950

Task force: former Chavez Ravine property: eminent domain: compensation.

CA SB249

Off-highway motor vehicle recreation.