California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB647

Introduced
2/19/21  
Refer
3/3/21  
Refer
3/9/21  
Refer
3/18/21  
Report Pass
4/7/21  
Refer
4/7/21  
Engrossed
4/22/21  
Refer
5/13/21  
Refer
6/17/21  
Refer
6/17/21  
Refer
6/16/22  
Refer
6/16/22  
Refer
6/16/22  
Report Pass
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Refer
6/22/22  
Report Pass
8/3/22  
Report Pass
8/3/22  
Refer
8/11/22  

Caption

Public employment: appointment.

Impact

The impact of SB 647 is significant as it streamlines the appointment process by removing ambiguity surrounding the effective date of an appointment. This change ensures consistent adherence to a defined start date for employment in civil service positions, which can influence various aspects of state operations, including payroll processing and employee benefits. This alignment with actual work commencement aims to enhance the clarity of civil service appointments and improve the overall efficiency of state employment practices.

Summary

Senate Bill 647, introduced by Senator Laird, amends Section 18525 of the Government Code concerning public employment, specifically about the definition of an appointment within the State Civil Service Act. The bill clarifies that for appointments occurring on or after January 1, 2023, the term 'appointment' refers to the date when an individual officially reports to work or the date specified by the appointing authority. This intends to codify existing practices regarding the appointment process for state civil service employees.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding SB 647 appears to be favorable among legislators, with unanimous support evidenced during voting, showing a recognition of the need for clarity in public employment practices. Stakeholders have perceived this legislative amendment as a positive step towards standardizing appointment processes, thus facilitating better human resource management within state agencies. The lack of opposition suggests that there may not be significant contention regarding the bill's provisions.

Contention

While SB 647 has not provoked considerable public opposition or debate, one potential point of contention could arise concerning how this stricter definition of appointment interacts with existing employee rights or entitlements. Although no significant issues were raised during discussions or the legislative process, future interpretations of this definition could lead to varying opinions on its implications for employee onboarding and operational practices within state departments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB519

Personal income tax: California Senior Citizen Advocacy Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

CA AB1093

Public postsecondary education: California-Mexico Higher Education Development and Academic Exchange Program.

CA AB2852

Public postsecondary education: California-Mexico Higher Education Development and Academic Exchange Program.

CA SB1063

California State Auditor: audit of the Legislature.

CA AB2353

Community colleges: planning grants: affordable student rental housing.

CA AB957

Higher education regional workforce coordination: California Workforce Development Board.

CA SB410

Public postsecondary education: California State University: nonfaculty staff employees: merit salary system.

CA SB326

Postsecondary education: Middle Class Scholarship Program.