Density Bonus Law: maximum allowable residential density: additional density bonus and incentives or concessions.
The revised statute aims to streamline the approval process for housing projects, particularly those targeting low and very low-income residents. By clarifying how maximum density is defined and removing conflicting provisions, AB 1287 intends to enhance developers’ opportunities to provide affordable housing. Local governments are mandated to grant additional bonuses to projects meeting specific income requirements, thereby fostering urban development that aligns with community housing needs.
Assembly Bill No. 1287, introduced by Alvarez, amends Section 65915 of the Government Code concerning California's Density Bonus Law. The law requires local governments to grant developers a density bonus along with other incentives if they commit to creating low-income housing. This bill proposes a new definition for maximum allowable residential density and revises the conditions under which developers can obtain additional density bonuses and concessions, encouraging more sustainable housing development, particularly for lower-income households.
The bill has garnered a generally positive sentiment among housing advocates and developers, who view it as a critical step toward addressing California's housing crisis. Proponents believe that by simplifying regulations and incentivizing the construction of more low-income housing units, the bill will alleviate some pressures in the housing market. However, there may be concerns regarding how local governments will adapt to these changes and whether sufficient safeguards will be in place to protect existing communities.
Notable points of contention revolve around concerns from local officials about the potential loss of control over zoning laws and development standards. Critics argue that while the bill aims to address housing shortages, it may dilute local governance and lead to developments that do not reflect the specific needs and character of communities. Additionally, there are apprehensions about the bill's impact on local infrastructure and resources if rapid developments outpace community services.