California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1679

Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Engrossed
3/30/23  
Refer
3/30/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Report Pass
6/19/23  
Refer
6/19/23  
Refer
6/19/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Refer
6/21/23  
Refer
6/21/23  
Report Pass
7/13/23  
Report Pass
7/13/23  
Refer
9/7/23  
Refer
9/7/23  
Enrolled
9/13/23  
Chaptered
10/10/23  
Chaptered
10/10/23  
Passed
10/10/23  

Caption

Transactions and use taxes: County of Los Angeles: homelessness.

Impact

This legislation effectively repeals Measure H, which previously established a local tax rate of 0.25% for similar purposes. By allowing for an increased tax rate, AB 1679 aims to enhance funding for homelessness prevention efforts and affordable housing strategies within Los Angeles. The bill mandates that the county include oversight and accountability measures in the proposed tax implementation to ensure that the funds are used appropriately. Moreover, if an ordinance proposing this tax is not passed by December 31, 2028, the bill will automatically be repealed.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1679, introduced by Representative Santiago, specifically focuses on the County of Los Angeles and addresses the pressing issue of homelessness through financial measures. The bill empowers the county to impose a transactions and use tax at a rate of up to 0.50%. This tax, which could exceed the traditional combined tax rate limit of 2% in the area, is contingent upon voter approval of an ordinance. If successful, all generated revenues from this tax must be specifically allocated to services geared towards addressing and preventing homelessness, as well as to affordable housing initiatives.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1679 reflects a significant concern for the homelessness crisis in Los Angeles. Supporters of the bill feel it is a crucial step toward addressing an urgent social issue by providing necessary resources, while also believing that community empowerment through voter involvement in tax decisions enhances democratic governance. However, there may be contention among constituents regarding increased taxation, especially in areas struggling economically.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential backlash from taxpayers regarding the imposition of a new service tax during a time when economic pressures are high. Critics might argue that any increase in taxes could disproportionately affect low- and middle-income residents. Conversely, advocates stress the crucial importance of addressing homelessness systematically through sustainable funding sources, viewing the increased tax as a necessary investment in community welfare rather than just a burden.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1860

Local government finance: special taxes: homeless housing and services.

CA AB2920

Transactions and use taxes: North Lake Tahoe Transportation Authority and City of Berkeley.

CA ACA1

Local government financing: affordable housing and public infrastructure: voter approval.

CA SB616

Child custody: child abuse and safety.

CA ACA1

Local government financing: affordable housing and public infrastructure: voter approval.

CA ACA1

Local government financing: affordable housing and public infrastructure: voter approval.

CA SB961

Enhanced infrastructure financing districts.

CA SB1144

Marketplaces: online marketplaces.