California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1853

Introduced
1/17/24  
Introduced
1/17/24  
Refer
1/29/24  
Refer
1/29/24  
Report Pass
3/11/24  
Report Pass
3/11/24  
Refer
3/12/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Report Pass
3/20/24  
Engrossed
4/25/24  
Engrossed
4/25/24  
Refer
4/25/24  
Refer
4/25/24  
Refer
5/8/24  
Refer
5/8/24  
Report Pass
6/3/24  
Report Pass
6/3/24  
Refer
6/3/24  
Refer
6/3/24  
Report Pass
6/12/24  
Report Pass
6/12/24  
Enrolled
8/22/24  
Chaptered
9/12/24  
Chaptered
9/12/24  
Passed
9/12/24  

Caption

San Joaquin Regional Transit District: meetings: surplus money investments.

Impact

The amendments aim to enhance the fiscal management capabilities of the San Joaquin Regional Transit District. By allowing the district to invest surplus funds in additional financial instruments, including the San Joaquin County Treasury Investment Pool, the bill expands the scope of investment opportunities. This change promotes better utilization of surplus funds and supports stronger financial planning within the district, aligning with broader goals of improving public transit services in the area.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1853, introduced by Villapudua, amends specific sections of the Public Utilities Code to affect the San Joaquin Regional Transit District. The bill modifies regulations regarding the compensation of the district's board members, allowing each member to receive $100 per meeting attended, and increases the maximum compensation to $500 in a calendar month. This change is intended to better compensate directors for their contributions while incentivizing greater participation in board meetings.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment surrounding AB 1853 appears to be favorable among local governance advocates who see it as a necessary step for strengthening the financial operations of the San Joaquin Regional Transit District. However, there may be concerns regarding how the increased compensation aligns with taxpayer interests. Supporters appreciate the merit-based accountability introduced through the adjusted compensation framework, while skeptics may question the efficiency of such investments.

Contention

A notable point of contention in discussions around AB 1853 may arise from the divergence in views about government investments and compensation for public officials. Some critics could argue that increasing compensation could further complicate public perceptions of government efficiency. Conversely, proponents assert that appropriate compensation ensures that capable individuals are attracted to serve on the board, ultimately benefiting the community's transit infrastructure. Thus, AB 1853 positions itself at the intersection of public governance, fiscal responsibility, and community service.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1363

Electrical corporations: financing wildfire expenses: executive compensation.

MI HB4279

Education: financing; requirements concerning taxes levied for area career and technical education programs; modify. Amends secs. 681 & 684 of 1976 PA 451 (MCL 380.681 & 380.684).

NJ A3330

Establishes procedure for certification of LGBTQ+ business.

MI HB4060

Education: financing; requirements concerning taxes levied for area career and technical education programs; modify. Amends secs. 681 & 684 of 1976 PA 451 (MCL 380.681 & 380.684).

CA AB1723

Horse Racing Law.

CA AB43

Taxation: prison contracts: goods and services.

CA SB1343

Public employees’ retirement: charter schools.

NJ S3318

Requires State reimbursement to local government units for first-year uncollected property tax revenue attributable to veterans' property tax exemptions.