California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2350

Introduced
2/12/24  
Introduced
2/12/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Report Pass
4/18/24  
Refer
4/18/24  
Refer
4/18/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Report Pass
4/25/24  
Refer
4/25/24  
Refer
4/25/24  
Report Pass
5/8/24  
Report Pass
5/8/24  
Engrossed
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/16/24  
Refer
5/16/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
5/29/24  
Report Pass
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/5/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Enrolled
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/15/24  
Chaptered
9/25/24  
Chaptered
9/25/24  
Passed
9/25/24  

Caption

Open meetings: school boards: emergencies: notifications by email.

Impact

The amendment established by AB 2350 fundamentally changes the communication requirements for school boards during emergencies, acknowledging the potential inadequacies of phone communication during such incidents. This aligns with the goals of the Ralph M. Brown Act, which mandates public meetings be held openly and emphasizes timely public access to information about these meetings. The bill mitigates disruptions in communication during crises, thereby ensuring that essential information reaches stakeholders swiftly, which may ultimately impact decision-making processes during emergencies.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2350, authored by Hoover, amends Section 54956.5 of the Government Code relating to open meetings. This bill specifically addresses how school boards manage notifications required for emergency meetings, allowing them to fulfill premeeting notice requirements via email rather than traditional telephone methods. This update is particularly relevant in circumstances where telephone services are disrupted, thus facilitating quicker and broader dissemination of information to the public and media. The bill aims to enhance accessibility and efficiency during emergencies when prompt action is vital.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2350 appears largely supportive, particularly among legislators concerned with improving public access and operational efficiency under challenging conditions. Proponents argue that this change modernizes public meeting notifications and incorporates practices aligned with current communication trends, particularly in emergency situations. While there may be some contention regarding the reliance on email, the overall sentiment among supporters suggests a recognition of the need for adaptive strategies in public communication.

Contention

A notable point of contention could arise regarding the dependency on email as a primary notification method, given that not all stakeholders may have immediate access to the internet in urgent situations. There could be concerns about how this might affect equitable access to information during emergencies, particularly for community members who may not have reliable internet connectivity. However, advocates of the bill counter that in the modern context, email is an essential tool for efficient communication, especially when traditional systems fail.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1000

Law enforcement agencies: radio communications.

CA SB719

Law enforcement agencies: radio communications.

CA AB2351

Suspensions and expulsions: acts occurring outside of school hours.

CA SB707

Open meetings: meeting and teleconference requirements.

CA AB883

California Public Records Act: personal information of elected and appointed officials.

CA SB1241

Safety and Violence Education for (SAVE) Students Act.

CA SB1000

Connected devices: device protection requests.

CA AB1899

Courts.