Electrified security fences.
A significant impact of AB 2371 is the removal of local governments' ability to prohibit electrified fences through ordinances if the use meets specific state requirements. While cities may still impose some limitations, they cannot enforce additional permits beyond what is mandated by the bill, thus centralizing regulatory control at the state level. This presents potential challenges for local jurisdictions in managing public safety and aesthetics, as communities may have varying views on the appropriateness of electrified security fencing.
Assembly Bill No. 2371, authored by Juan Carrillo, aims to amend existing laws regarding electrified security fences in California. The bill allows property owners to install electrified security fences on manufacturing, industrial, or specifically zoned commercial properties until January 1, 2028. This change is intended to enhance security measures against trespassing and theft, particularly in sectors that store or service valuable equipment, vehicles, or materials. Notably, the bill endorses the use of solar-powered electrical energizers and establishes standards for the fence's design, including maximum height and electrical characteristics.
The sentiment surrounding AB 2371 is mixed. Proponents, including business owners and some members of the legislature, argue that enhancing security measures is crucial for protecting assets and ensuring workplace safety. Conversely, critics express concerns about the potential dangers posed by electrified fences, such as accidental injuries to individuals who may come into contact with them. Additionally, there is apprehension that the broad application of this legislation undermines local control over land use and safety regulations.
A point of contention arises from the urgency statute declaration attached to AB 2371, which suggests immediate implementation due to escalating security concerns. Critics argue that the urgent passage may overlook thorough public discourse on the potential ramifications, particularly regarding the harmonization of local and state laws. The long-term efficacy of such security measures and their implications for community safety remain central to the debate surrounding the bill.