California Assembly Bill AB358

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/21
• Refer: 2/12/21
• Report Pass: 3/22/21
• Refer: 3/23/21
• Report Pass: 5/4/21
• Engrossed: 5/27/21
• Refer: 5/28/21
• Refer: 6/9/21
• Report Pass: 6/30/21
• Enrolled: 8/23/21
• Chaptered: 8/31/21
• Passed: 8/31/21

Caption

Electrified security fences: permitted use.

Impact

The impact of AB 358 is significant as it facilitates heightened security measures for commercial and industrial properties, potentially reducing theft and unauthorized access. The bill explicitly permits the use of electrified fences that meet certain safety standards, aligning with international regulations. However, it also preserves local control by stipulating that property owners cannot install such fences if local ordinances prohibit them. This provision is essential to maintain a balance between enhanced security measures and community regulations.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 358 amends Section 835 of the Civil Code to regulate the use of electrified security fences specifically for commercial, manufacturing, or industrial properties. The bill allows property owners to install these fences as long as they adhere to specific height requirements and safety standards. Notably, the maximum height of an electrified security fence is capped at 10 feet or 2 feet above an existing perimeter fence, whichever is greater. The new regulations require these fences to be placed behind a perimeter fence that is at least 5 feet tall and include warning signs notifying of their presence and dangers.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding AB 358 appears to be favorable among proponents of enhanced security measures for businesses. Supporters argue that the bill will help protect industries from crime and enhance public safety around commercial areas. Opponents may raise concerns regarding the implications for neighborhood aesthetic and potential safety issues raised by electrified fences, particularly if proper warnings and signage are not adequately managed.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the local ordinance aspect of the bill. While it empowers property owners to implement electrified security measures, it simultaneously allows for local governments to restrict such installations. There is potential for conflict between property owners seeking to enhance security and local jurisdictions aiming to maintain community standards and safety. Thus, the implications of this bill could lead to varying interpretations and conditions across different regions.